Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2023-8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2023-8
30 Aug 2023
 | 30 Aug 2023
Status: a revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal HGSS and is expected to appear here in due course.

Comparing the evolution of ESA versus NASA technology transfer approach: market and public demand drivers

Giorgio Petroni, Benedetta Pini, Serena Filippelli, and Alberto Petroni

Abstract. The growth of space activities has experienced rapid expansion in the last twenty years, largely driven by the transfer of technology. This process has had not only economic and social effects but also important political and military implications.

The primary entities responsible for sharing scientific and technological knowledge have been the prominent space agencies. This article seeks to compare the approaches developed by NASA and ESA throughout the years. The comparison reveals significant differences between the two agencies in terms of their goals and the methods they employ to achieve them. These disparities can even be traced back to the legislation that established each respective agency.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Giorgio Petroni, Benedetta Pini, Serena Filippelli, and Alberto Petroni

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hgss-2023-8', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Sep 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alberto Petroni, 11 Oct 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Alberto Petroni, 05 Dec 2023
  • CC1: 'Comment on hgss-2023-8', Chiara Verbano, 30 Oct 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on CC1', Alberto Petroni, 05 Dec 2023
  • RC2: 'General review of the manuscript', Pierre Potin, 10 Nov 2023

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hgss-2023-8', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Sep 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alberto Petroni, 11 Oct 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Alberto Petroni, 05 Dec 2023
  • CC1: 'Comment on hgss-2023-8', Chiara Verbano, 30 Oct 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on CC1', Alberto Petroni, 05 Dec 2023
  • RC2: 'General review of the manuscript', Pierre Potin, 10 Nov 2023
Giorgio Petroni, Benedetta Pini, Serena Filippelli, and Alberto Petroni
Giorgio Petroni, Benedetta Pini, Serena Filippelli, and Alberto Petroni

Viewed

Total article views: 505 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
420 62 23 505 10 8
  • HTML: 420
  • PDF: 62
  • XML: 23
  • Total: 505
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Aug 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Aug 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 498 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 498 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 May 2024
Download
Short summary
ESA and NASA have distinct technology transfer approaches, including differences in organizational structure, funding mechanisms, intellectual property strategies, international collaborations, business incubation centers, and commercialization focus. However, both agencies share the common goals of maximizing the societal and economic impact of space technologies and fostering innovation through technology transfer.