Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2026-17
https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2026-17
01 Oct 2026
 | 01 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal HGSS.

Strata super strata: the stratigraphy of Thomas Wright of Durham (1711–1786)

Brian K. Tanner and David A. T. Harper

Abstract. The stratigraphic ideas found in a late eighteenth-century manuscript of the English cosmologist, Thomas Wright of Durham, are described and discussed in the context of the development of his contemporaries’ ideas concerning the age of the Earth and formation of its rock strata. Wright, a convinced Plutonist in his explanation of the volcanic origin of horizontal strata, invoked the earlier concept of vegetative growth of minerals as a way of accounting for inclined strata. Mountains grew from small stones and emerged from the sea, pushing initially horizontal volcanic strata into inclined or vertical orientations. In emerging, they acquired a layer of shells of marine animals, which subsequently were located on the tops of mountains. Through assessment of the degree of petrification, Wright concluded that the age of the Earth was substantially greater than a few thousand years. His thesis that the Solar System represented planets at different stages of evolution through time, Saturn being the youngest and Mercury the oldest, implied to him that at least 1012 years was necessary for completion of the cycle from creation to destruction of a planet, including the Earth. Wright’s model of the origin and evolution of the Earth was heavily influenced by the writings of Burnet and Whiston, but the stratigraphic ideas were drawn from later debates on the origin of strata and their fossils. The manuscript precedes the publication by James Hutton of observation of unconformities and their implication for the age of the Earth. It provides a fascinating insight into the mind of a second-tier scientist, who nevertheless was party to the ferment of ideas in circulation prior to Hutton’s paradigm-changing paper.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Brian K. Tanner and David A. T. Harper

Status: open (until 29 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Brian K. Tanner and David A. T. Harper
Brian K. Tanner and David A. T. Harper
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
The stratigraphic ideas and models found in an unpublished manuscript by Thomas Wright of Durham (1711–1786) are described and discussed. Horizontal strata were deemed to be volcanic in origin. Vertical strata arose from growth of mountains emerging from water that tilted initially horizontal strata. The work shows the undercurrents of debate in the late 18th century prior to the geological revolution of the early 19th century.
Share