the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
History of Research on Cloud Types and Naming of Clouds
Abstract. Otto von Guericke was the first who experimentally demonstrated cloud formation by expanding and cooling of compressed air before 1663. Scientists initially grappled with the very question of why clouds float. Early explanations were hindered by limited theoretical understanding, imprecise instruments, and lack of meteorological knowledge.
First attempts for distinguishing various cloud types arose towards the End of the 18th century. A key turning point came in 1803 when Howard proposed a first systematic scheme using Latin terminology for different cloud types. This effort laid the cornerstone for what would evolve into today's internationally recognized cloud classification system. The way toward an accurate understanding was long and iterative. Early laboratory experiments and rudimentary instruments led to recurring misjudgements that persisted for decades. The advent of manned balloon ascents enabled direct measurements of meteorological parameters in the free atmosphere, though initial findings were compromised by instrumental errors. Over time, as more reliable, bias-free devices became available, scientists could obtain accurate data. New measuring techniques had to be developed for determining cloud altitudes and tracking their motion, thereby enriching the understanding of the atmospheric vertical profiles of temperature and moisture influencing the formation of various cloud types.
Cloud research was further intensified by international cooperation. Beginning in the 1890s, scientists started creating internationally acceptable cloud atlases, despite challenges such as early poor photographs with insufficient contrast. Alternatives, like paintings or cloud watercolours, were even considered to overcome these early hurdles. The intensive observation programs – using daily pilot balloons, kites, and later weather aircraft – allowed researchers to uncover cloud formation processes both in stable and unstable atmospheric conditions. Observations also revealed the discovery of clouds above the tropopause and in the mesosphere. After many national attempts to publish cloud atlases the establishment of the World Meteorological Organization in 1951 paved the way for the modern International Cloud Atlas, published in 1956, which standardized cloud observation practices and naming of cloud types worldwide.
- Preprint
(4714 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
CC1: 'Comment on hgss-2025-3', Andreas Dörnbrack, 08 Aug 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Peter Winkler, 02 Nov 2025
Answer to Andreas Dörnbrack
Thank you for the review and valuable suggestions.
The paper has been revised and recommendations have been considered.
The new title is now:
A 300-Year History of Understanding and Classifying Clouds, from a German Language Perspective.
The link to the actual international cloud atlas is included as well as all doi’s which I could identify.
Many of the references are accessible in digital form in large libraries like BSB, German Weather Service, LMU and others About half of the references I could download to my computer. Whether large libraries will allow to store them as an annex of my MS on a HGSS-Server is not known to me. I will ask the editor, whether this matter can be made accessible. The simplest way would be to ask me for titles of interest and I will send these on a direct way.
The third suggestion is very special and I hesitate to include a new satellite research program which is recommended for funding. While I agree that it is necessary to collect material for a better cloud climatology, I think that contemporary weather models adequately capture the large‑scale circulation. Deficiencies remain, however, in the representation of cloud formation at small scales: besides the three‑dimensional distributions of temperature and humidity, orography, radiative forcing, local wind systems, gravity waves, and heterogeneous soil moisture are of importance for cloud formation and interact in a complex manner. Satellite sensors that sample a region only once per day or less frequently cannot provide the temporal resolution needed to capture these processes comprehensively. It is unclear for me whether the WIVERN project will resolve vertical transports within clouds with sufficient reliability for process studies.
I will leave it to the editor to decide whether a corresponding hint on the WIVERN project should be included in the manuscript.
From my point of view view, a fractal description of cloud forms would currently be more trend-setting, but it is not apparent for me whether the planned WIVERN observations will permit investigation of fractal aspects.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2025-3-AC1 -
AC5: 'Reply on CC1', Peter Winkler, 04 Nov 2025
This comment appeared unintended and duplicates the reply to the editor.
Thus it dan be deleted
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2025-3-AC5
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Peter Winkler, 02 Nov 2025
-
RC1: 'Comment on hgss-2025-3', Stephen Burt, 08 Aug 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://hgss.copernicus.org/preprints/hgss-2025-3/hgss-2025-3-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Winkler, 02 Nov 2025
Answer to the review of Stephen Burt:
Tank you very much for valuable comments and marking formulations leading to misinterpretations.
The title has been changed to highlight the focus on German-language sources. The new title is:
A 300-Year History of Understanding and Classifying Clouds, from a German Language Perspective.
I have thoroughly revised the manuscript, tightened the phrasing, and removed less significant material. The length of the manuscript was greatly reduced.
Numerous passages were reworded to (hopefully) resolve earlier ambiguities.
Adiabatic charts are now briefly mentioned because they promoted theoretical thermodynamic insights that improved and facilitated the understanding of cloud formation. I also mention the tephigram and the MINTRA-line as a threshhold for contrail formation.
The number of footnotes has been reduced to the absolutely necessary number.
Special answers and remarks:
Microphysical aspects were not discussed; instead, the reader is referred to the classic textbook by Mason (1957) for those aspects.
Artistic depictions of clouds are likewise not treated here, since an extensive literature already exists; had I expanded the manuscript too much. I should have mentioned not only Constable but also Goethe, Georg Dillis, Caspar David Friedrich, and many others. The special reason why watercolors of Mylius are presented is that Köppen and Wegener intended to edit an cloud atlas with his pictures in 1917.
It remains uncertain whether Halley knew of von Guericke’s “Experimenta nova” in detail: Halley did not quote Guericke and some scholars infer from that omission that he may not have been familiar with the Latin language. But you are right, as a member of the Royal Academy he should have had knowledge of the review and report of Guericks book.
Glaisher’s well‑known balloon ascents were omitted from discussion because his temperature and other measurements of meteorological parameters were considered insufficiently for reliable conclusions on atmospheric states and cloud formation. This has been extensively discussed in Assmann et al. 1900.
Figure 13 (now Figure 11) was selected because the 1917 photograph clearly documents the breakup of a cloud deck above the course af a river, a pattern comparable to that reported by Erk from a balloon observation in 1898. I have not found a comparable photograph.
Douglas’s cloud photographs were taken as an extra work during routine meteorological flights rather than as a dedicated observational campaign; consequently, they provide no demonstrable evidence of orographic interaction on the observed cloud layers.
“It seems odd not to include in this section more recent publications”:
I concentrated on the historical development and on the numerous efforts required to resolve the long‑standing ambiguities in the correct classification of cloud types. Recent literature recommending cloud observation for interested persons were therefore omitted.
Stratospheric and mesospheric clouds were included because I was asked in advance to mention these cloud types and provide illustrations for reasons of completeness.
Regarding satellite imagery, it can be assumed that not only Wexler but the whole meteorological community recognized the huge advance achieved by satellite cloud imagery; satellite cloud pictures provided synoptic information over the oceans, where in situ observations were sparse.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2025-3-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Peter Winkler, 02 Nov 2025
-
EC1: 'Comment on hgss-2025-3', Hans Volkert, 27 Oct 2025
Comment by Handling topical editor:
The available comments
RC1 and CC1 (=RC2) are both to be regarded as reviewers' comments.
This was communicated to the author, Peter Winkler, who is in the process of producing a substantially revised manuscript.
Hans Volkert (Handling topical editor and HGSS co-editor)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2025-3-EC1 -
AC4: 'Reply on EC1', Peter Winkler, 02 Nov 2025
I have addressed the comments of both reviewers in the revised version of the manuscript. Below I summarise the principal changes and the editorial improvements I have made.
Title and scope
The title has been changed to: A 300‑Year History of Understanding and Classifying Clouds, from a German Language Perspective.
The length of the text has been substantially reduced; marginal material has been omitted and numerous dispersed passages have been consolidated, although this was not possible in all cases.
I repeatedly draw attention to the recurring obstacles in the correct nomenclature of cloud types, a historical difficulty that is no longer widely appreciated.
I emphasise the shortcomings of illustrating cloud types in atlases, notably the limitations of printing technology and the longstanding deficiencies of early photography.
A close reading shows that misclassifications were only overcome once meteorological flights provided sufficient knowledge of the atmospheric state to enable a coherent understanding of cloud formation and the emergence of distinct cloud forms that could be taught.
Specific responses to reviewers suggestions
- I decided to mention adiabatic diagrams briefly in accordance with R. Burt’s suggestion. The literature shows that Hertz’s first graph (1884) prompted W. von Bezold in his work on thermodynamics, to examine the issue more closely and to introduce the concept of potential temperature.
- I incorporated only a small portion of the further litrature recommended by Burt because many of those works are of a popular‑scientific nature.
- For the microphysics not treated in this manuscript I refer the reader to Mason.
To my knowledge, Britain placed early and strong emphasis on weather forecasting and on improving forecasts from cloud observations. The purely scientific aim of characterising cloud forms through accurate measurement of atmospheric state variables was of secondary importance there.
On A. Dörnbrack’s recommendations:
- Inclusion of historical literature in an archive
I hold digital copies of at least half of the cited literature. However, I am aware from the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek that copyright issues must be observed, and I cannot assess whether it is permissible to upload digital scans to the HGSS server.
Uploading would also duplicate storage effort, since most digitised items are already available elsewhere.
I could indicate in the references which libraries provide digital scans, but this would entail considerable additional work. I offered A. Dörnbrack that I can send him literature being of interest directly..
- Reference to the ESA WIVERN project
I do not consider it appropriate to mention the WIVERN funding programme of ESA in this manuscript, because other funding programmes would then arguably need to be mentioned as well.
I leave it to you, the editors, to decide whether Dörnbrack’s suggested reference to WIVERN should be included.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2025-3-AC4
-
AC4: 'Reply on EC1', Peter Winkler, 02 Nov 2025
-
AC3: 'Comment on hgss-2025-3', Peter Winkler, 02 Nov 2025
I have addressed the comments of both reviewers in the revised version of the manuscript. Below I summarise the principal changes and the editorial improvements I have made.
Title and scope
The title has been changed to: A 300‑Year History of Understanding and Classifying Clouds, from a German Language Perspective.
The length of the text has been substantially reduced; marginal material has been omitted and numerous dispersed passages have been consolidated, although this was not possible in all cases.
I repeatedly draw attention to the recurring obstacles in the correct nomenclature of cloud types, a historical difficulty that is no longer widely appreciated.
I emphasise the shortcomings of illustrating cloud types in atlases, notably the limitations of printing technology and the longstanding deficiencies of early photography.
A close reading shows that misclassifications were only overcome once meteorological flights provided sufficient knowledge of the atmospheric state to enable a coherent understanding of cloud formation and the emergence of distinct cloud forms that could be taught.
Specific responses to reviewers suggestions
- I decided to mention adiabatic diagrams briefly in accordance with R. Burt’s suggestion. The literature shows that Hertz’s first graph (1884) prompted W. von Bezold in his work on thermodynamics, to examine the issue more closely and to introduce the concept of potential temperature.
- I incorporated only a small portion of the further litrature recommended by Burt because many of those works are of a popular‑scientific nature.
- For the microphysics not treated in this manuscript I refer the reader to Mason.
To my knowledge, Britain placed early and strong emphasis on weather forecasting and on improving forecasts from cloud observations. The purely scientific aim of characterising cloud forms through accurate measurement of atmospheric state variables was of secondary importance there.
On A. Dörnbrack’s recommendations:
- Inclusion of historical literature in an archive
I hold digital copies of at least half of the cited literature. However, I am aware from the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek that copyright issues must be observed, and I cannot assess whether it is permissible to upload digital scans to the HGSS server.
Uploading would also duplicate storage effort, since most digitised items are already available elsewhere.
I could indicate in the references which libraries provide digital scans, but this would entail considerable additional work. I offered A. Dörnbrack that I can send him literature being of interest directly..
- Reference to the ESA WIVERN project
I do not consider it appropriate to mention the WIVERN funding programme of ESA in this manuscript, because other funding programmes would then arguably need to be mentioned as well.
I leave it to you, the editors, to decide whether Dörnbrack’s suggested reference to WIVERN should be included.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2025-3-AC3 -
RC2: 'Comment on hgss-2025-3', Hans Volkert, 03 Nov 2025
Dear author Peter Winkler,
I formally enter this comment as a second official review for your manuscript hgss-2025-3 in order to placate the automatic system, which demands that. Please note, as we had already discussed, that the named comments
a) CC1 by Dörnbrack and
b) RC1 by Burt
were provided by the selected reviewers.
I am aware that you have started some time ago to produce a substantially revised version of your manuscipt including a better fitting title. I trust that the manuscript handling system will now provide you with a route to uploaded the finished revision in due course.
A am sorry for the delays caused in part by the wrong categorization of Dörnbracks review (CC1 instead of RC2) and also through my too slow reaction. I hope you can resort to the old saying "All's well that ends well" oder "Ende gut - alles gut".
With kind regards und besten Grüßen
Hans Volkert
PS: as to Dörnbrack's point (3) about the recent ESA initiative WIVERN as a spaceborne cloud observation programme, you may end your concluding section with general sentences like
"At the end of this three-century-tour of scientific enquiry about Cloud Classification it is interesting to note that space agencies started to re-address this old topic with planned multiple-instrument observations from satellites. The recently selected WIVERN explorer mission of the European Space Agency (https://wivern.polito.it) can be regarded as an illustrative example."
I think that you would obtain for your article a fine link to current research initiativess, but I want to leave the final decision to you as the author, whether or not you want to follow the suggestion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-2025-3-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 654 | 83 | 23 | 760 | 32 | 48 |
- HTML: 654
- PDF: 83
- XML: 23
- Total: 760
- BibTeX: 32
- EndNote: 48
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Title: History of Research on Cloud Types and Naming of Clouds
This article describes the a brief journey through the history of cloud research, written from the perspective of an experienced meteorologist who worked at the Hohenpeißenberg research observatory and managed it for many years. There are two main aspects of this contribution. Firstly, what are clouds composed of? It is an exciting story to read that a theory of gas-filled bubbles (“hollow vesicles”) has been able to survive for so long. The second focus is on the history of how different cloud forms are named and classified. This part is related to the slow and tedious progress made in the international meteorological organizations and commissions over many years. It culminates in the International Cloud Atlas, which has a remarkable, very well illustrated website:
https://cloudatlas.wmo.int/en/home.html
I would suggest to include this reference and to recommend its use for obtaining the current status of cloud nomenclature.
Altogether, this paper is certainly also a document of history. It is the very first paper I have reviewed in the last ten years or so that does not contain any link to a website. Unfortunately, this style might not make the paper very attractive to today's generation, who are used to having instant access to almost all information via websites.
I have only a few suggestions:
(1) The title is rather general, the content, the selection of figures, and the view on the topic, however, are certainly selected by the author himself and are rather personal. Maybe, a slight modification like
A brief (personal ??) journey through the research history of cloud types and their naming
is more appropriate.
(2) Since many facts are only briefly mentioned, sometimes only in the form of one-sentence lists, the corresponding references are the essential element to obtain a more complete knowledge of the topics. Is it possible to make this “data” publicly available? On the one hand, you could use data object identifiers (DOI) for journal papers as far as available, for example:
STÖRMER, C. Height of Mother of Pearl Clouds observed in Southern Norway during 1926–34. Nature 145, 221–222 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1038/145221a0On the other hand, the entire wealth of historical material could be bundled in a publicly accessible archive. I would certainly have used one or the other link to obtain more information.
(3) Clouds are the most unknown component of the climate system and they are an essential element that needs to be observed globally with high spatial and temporal resolution. Just recently, the ESA Advisory Committee for Earth Observation (ACEO) recommend to fund a satellite mission (https://wivern.polito.it/) to obtain these observations. The text would actually gain some appeal if the author could refer to such recent developments in the Introduction or the Conclusions to emphasize the need to be aware of the historical development in this area. And this short historical stroll can help you do just that.