History of Research on Cloud Types and Naming of Clouds
Abstract. Otto von Guericke was the first who experimentally demonstrated cloud formation by expanding and cooling of compressed air before 1663. Scientists initially grappled with the very question of why clouds float. Early explanations were hindered by limited theoretical understanding, imprecise instruments, and lack of meteorological knowledge.
First attempts for distinguishing various cloud types arose towards the End of the 18th century. A key turning point came in 1803 when Howard proposed a first systematic scheme using Latin terminology for different cloud types. This effort laid the cornerstone for what would evolve into today's internationally recognized cloud classification system. The way toward an accurate understanding was long and iterative. Early laboratory experiments and rudimentary instruments led to recurring misjudgements that persisted for decades. The advent of manned balloon ascents enabled direct measurements of meteorological parameters in the free atmosphere, though initial findings were compromised by instrumental errors. Over time, as more reliable, bias-free devices became available, scientists could obtain accurate data. New measuring techniques had to be developed for determining cloud altitudes and tracking their motion, thereby enriching the understanding of the atmospheric vertical profiles of temperature and moisture influencing the formation of various cloud types.
Cloud research was further intensified by international cooperation. Beginning in the 1890s, scientists started creating internationally acceptable cloud atlases, despite challenges such as early poor photographs with insufficient contrast. Alternatives, like paintings or cloud watercolours, were even considered to overcome these early hurdles. The intensive observation programs – using daily pilot balloons, kites, and later weather aircraft – allowed researchers to uncover cloud formation processes both in stable and unstable atmospheric conditions. Observations also revealed the discovery of clouds above the tropopause and in the mesosphere. After many national attempts to publish cloud atlases the establishment of the World Meteorological Organization in 1951 paved the way for the modern International Cloud Atlas, published in 1956, which standardized cloud observation practices and naming of cloud types worldwide.
Title: History of Research on Cloud Types and Naming of Clouds
This article describes the a brief journey through the history of cloud research, written from the perspective of an experienced meteorologist who worked at the Hohenpeißenberg research observatory and managed it for many years. There are two main aspects of this contribution. Firstly, what are clouds composed of? It is an exciting story to read that a theory of gas-filled bubbles (“hollow vesicles”) has been able to survive for so long. The second focus is on the history of how different cloud forms are named and classified. This part is related to the slow and tedious progress made in the international meteorological organizations and commissions over many years. It culminates in the International Cloud Atlas, which has a remarkable, very well illustrated website:
https://cloudatlas.wmo.int/en/home.html
I would suggest to include this reference and to recommend its use for obtaining the current status of cloud nomenclature.
Altogether, this paper is certainly also a document of history. It is the very first paper I have reviewed in the last ten years or so that does not contain any link to a website. Unfortunately, this style might not make the paper very attractive to today's generation, who are used to having instant access to almost all information via websites.
I have only a few suggestions:
(1) The title is rather general, the content, the selection of figures, and the view on the topic, however, are certainly selected by the author himself and are rather personal. Maybe, a slight modification like
A brief (personal ??) journey through the research history of cloud types and their naming
is more appropriate.
(2) Since many facts are only briefly mentioned, sometimes only in the form of one-sentence lists, the corresponding references are the essential element to obtain a more complete knowledge of the topics. Is it possible to make this “data” publicly available? On the one hand, you could use data object identifiers (DOI) for journal papers as far as available, for example:
STÖRMER, C. Height of Mother of Pearl Clouds observed in Southern Norway during 1926–34. Nature 145, 221–222 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1038/145221a0On the other hand, the entire wealth of historical material could be bundled in a publicly accessible archive. I would certainly have used one or the other link to obtain more information.
(3) Clouds are the most unknown component of the climate system and they are an essential element that needs to be observed globally with high spatial and temporal resolution. Just recently, the ESA Advisory Committee for Earth Observation (ACEO) recommend to fund a satellite mission (https://wivern.polito.it/) to obtain these observations. The text would actually gain some appeal if the author could refer to such recent developments in the Introduction or the Conclusions to emphasize the need to be aware of the historical development in this area. And this short historical stroll can help you do just that.