<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HGSS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>History of Geo- and Space Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HGSS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hist. Geo Space. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2190-5029</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hgss-7-1-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>History of the Juliusruh ionospheric observatory<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>
on Rügen</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Juliusruh ionospheric observatory on R\"{u}gen}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Wei{\ss}}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weiß</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          <email>weiss.wiek@arcor.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Leibniz-Institute of Atmospheric Physics e.V., University Rostock,
Field Station Juliusruh,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 18556 Altenkirchen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">J. Weiß (weiss.wiek@arcor.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage><lpage>22</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016.html">This article is available from https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The history of the Juliusruh ionospheric observatory on Rügen is closely
connected to the history of ground-based ionospheric sounding. After a short
introduction to the ionospheric research and the sounding technique, the
founding of the Juliusruh station in 1954 and its development until today are
described. The different methods of ground-based sounding – as far as they
apply to Juliusruh – are briefly discussed. The condition of life and work
in a small team on the island of Rügen, remote from the respective parent
institute, is also the subject of this article, whose author headed Juliusruh
Station from 1965 to 2004.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The discovery of the ionosphere goes back to the year 1839, when the German
mathematician and physicist Carl Friedrich Gauss postulated that an
electrically conducting region of the atmosphere could account for observed
variations of the Earth's magnetic field (Gauss, 1839). At the beginning of
the 20th century, long-distance radio communication became important. In 1901
Guglielmo Marconi performed the first transatlantic radio connection between
Cornwall and Newfoundland. As radio waves in the atmosphere propagate along
straight lines, to reach Newfoundland, the signal would have to bounce off a
reflector in the higher atmosphere – the ionosphere. The ionosphere owes its
existence primarily to radiation from the Sun. The energy of that radiation
dissociates the electrical neutral atoms and molecules to electrically
charged particles (ions and electrons). As the mass of electrons is small in
comparison to that of ions, they interact with electromagnetic waves stronger
than the ions. That is why the electron density (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
ionosphere is an essential factor in ionospheric radio research (Rawer,
1953).</p>
      <p>The decrease in solar radiation in a path through the Earth's atmosphere to
the ground as well as variations of density and constitution of the air along
this way cause the emergence of maxima and minima in the vertical
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile of the ionosphere shown in Fig. 1. The regions around
near the density maxima, starting at the bottom, were labelled D Region,
E Region and F Region (Fig. 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Vertical daytime profile of electron density.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In addition to the regular flux of solar radiation, numerous other factors
affect the structure and dynamics of the ionosphere. Among these factors are
the geomagnetic field, the interplanetary magnetic field and the
interplanetary flux of particles. Particulary the solar wind and its
correlation with the 11-year cycle of solar activity together with flares of
particles and X-rays occurring in active regions around sunspots affect the
Earth's ionosphere (Taubenheim, 1957). Such events are termed ionospheric
disturbances. Ionospheric disturbances are very important both for practical
use of the ionosphere as a mirror of radio waves and the scientific research
of the Earth's upper atmosphere.</p>
      <p>The classical method of ground-based observations of the ionosphere relies on
the interaction between electromagnetic waves and the electrically charged
particles in the ionosphere.</p>
      <p>If a radio wave propagates in the ionosphere, its energy will be partly
absorbed along its path. The amount of absorption is directly related to the
electron density <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along a particular path through the ionosphere.</p>
      <p>If a radio wave with frequency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> propagates vertically upward in the
ionosphere encountering increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it will be reflected at the
height where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> satisfies the relation

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Hz</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>(total refection) (Rawer and Suchy, 1967). In
the D Region where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is too small for total reflection, tiny
amounts of the wave's energy may be reflected (partial reflections) .</p>
      <p>A method of active ground-based sounding of the ionosphere was applied for
the first time in the 1920s. This method uses radio waves at frequencies
between 1 and 30 MHz, vertically transmitted into the ionosphere and there
completely reflected back to the Earth (Breit and Tuve, 1925). With this
method it is possible to calculate
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>the height of the reflecting layer from the signal transit time,</p></list-item><list-item><p>the electron density of the reflecting point from the signal carrier
frequency, and</p></list-item><list-item><p>the electron density below the reflecting layer from the signal
absorption along the path (method A1).</p></list-item></list>
The Juliusruh station began operation in 1954 using active sounding of the
ionosphere in the described manner.</p>
      <p>The principle of an echo sounder is applied in other measuring systems of
atmospheric research too. Instead of electromagnetic pulses, laser pulses
(LIDAR) and acoustic signals (SODAR) are transmitted from the ground towards
the ionosphere. Both LIDAR and SODAR were temporarily operating at Juliusruh.</p>
      <p>Unlike the active soundings, passive methods do not require pulse
transmitters. They make use of continuous wave transmission from commercial
radio stations by observing the sky-wave field strength (method A3). Another
passive method is to record the radiation of cosmic noise and its attenuation
(CNA) due to the ionosphere (method A2). Both of these methods were applied
temporarily in Juliusruh.</p>
      <p>The ionosphere is an important indicator of global environmental changes.
Natural and man-made activities or events in the Earth's atmosphere may cause
short-, medium-, and long-term variations in the ionosphere. Such variations
are detectable in the data archives of ionospheric stations around the world
(Figs. 2 and 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>The Heinrich Hertz Institute of Oscillation Research (HHI)</title>
      <p>The HHI was founded 1928. Its first director, Professor K. W. Wagner, was a
pioneer of communications engineering. Radio-wave propagation through the
ionosphere has been a research topic of the HHI, along with technological
tasks in the fields of mechanical, acoustic, and electromagnetic
oscillations, since its foundation. The HHI organised an expedition to
Tromsö (Norway) from 1932 to 1934 in order to research radio-wave
propagation inside the polar cap (Schlegel and Lühr, 2014). In 1934 the
impact of a solar eclipse on the ionosphere was investigated by observing the
sky waves of radio stations.</p>
      <p>After the end of World War II the HHI was incorporated into the Deutsche
Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin and continued its work under the
director G. Leithäuser. In the course of the division of Germany into a
Soviet-ruled East and a free West, the HHI was partitioned too into an East
Berlin and a West Berlin institute. The HHI in East Berlin was headed by
Professor Otto Hachenberg from 1951 to 1961. He founded the field station in
Juliusruh on Rügen (Fig. 4) in 1954. In subsequent years the eastern HHI
was known by various names (Böhm et al., 1997):
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Heinrich-Hertz-Institut für solar-terrestrische Physik in the
period July 1967 to December 1968;</p></list-item><list-item><p>Zentralinstitut für solar-terrestrische Physik
(Heinrich-Hertz-Institut) in the period January 1969 to April 1984;</p></list-item><list-item><p>Heinrich-Hertz-Institut für Atmosphärenforschung und
Geomagnetismus in the period May 1984 to December 1991; and</p></list-item><list-item><p>From 1991 after dissolving the HHI (East), the department in
Kühlungsborn was newly founded as the Institut für
Atmosphärenphysik (IAP). Since then the Juliusruh field station has been
a part of the IAP. The IAP later joined the Leibniz Research Cluster.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Original scaling results (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plots) of the Juliusruh ionosonde
measurements from the day of the fission bomb test over Novaya Semlya on
30 October 1961, and from the day after (Fig. 3); 90 min after the blast,
irregular variations of F Region electron density commenced, lasting for
nearly 5 h.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>See caption of Fig. 2.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f03.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>The founding of the station on Juliusruh</title>
      <p>On 30 June 1954 a solar eclipse occurred with the umbra trace at the southern
part of Sweden and the middle Baltic. Solar eclipses act as an abrupt
switch-off of the solar radiation in the umbra region. That affords an
opportunity to observe the recombination process in the ionosphere.</p>
      <p>The HHI planned an extensive measuring campaign in the vicinity of the umbra.
Due to the travel restriction in East Germany, the location had to be inside
the state territory of the GDR. The northernmost region of the GDR was the
peninsula of Wittow on Rügen in the Baltic Sea. That location (Fig. 5)
had different advantages:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>distance to the umbra region only 200 km;</p></list-item><list-item><p>no foreign currencies necessary;</p></list-item><list-item><p>the operating staff did not need exit visas for “capitalist
countries”;</p></list-item><list-item><p>the north of the seaside resort of Juliusruh was an undeveloped open
woodland of sufficient size for transmitting and receiving aerials; and</p></list-item><list-item><p>the planned field station filled a gap between the ionospheric
observatories of Lindau (Germany) and Uppsala (Sweden).</p></list-item></list>
For the measuring campaign the HHI constructed two wooden cottages, each
25 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in size, along with the necessary transmitting and receiving
antennas (Figs. 7 to 10).</p>
      <p>The wooden antenna masts had to be erected by pure manpower, because there
were no truck-mounted cranes available.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Professor Dr. Otto Hachenberg, director of the HHI, viewing the
location for the prospective ionospheric station of Juliusruh, 1954.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f04.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Path of the umbra over northern Europe during the solar eclipse on
30 June 1954.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f05.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>The staff for establishment and operation of the station travelled
in turns from Berlin to Juliusruh, using the HHI's own minibus. This vehicle
soon became well known on the Wittow Peninsula. Sometimes the men were
accompanied by their families.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f06.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Surveying for the antenna farm.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f07.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Surveying for the antenna farm.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f08.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Erection of the first antenna masts in 1954.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f09.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Erection of the first antenna masts in 1954.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f10.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In June 1954 the schedule of observations in Juliusruh started with vertical
sounding in order to determine the ionospheric radio-wave absorption by
method A1. For the A1 measurements a frequency of 3.86 MHz was employed by
the HHI. A second method was temporarily employed utilising a frequency that
continuously rose from 1 MHz up to 20 MHz – the ionosonde.</p>
      <p>Measurements employing the A1 method enabled the investigators to observe the
diurnal variations as well as the seasonal variations of radio-wave
absorption in the ionosphere. Because this sounding system is based on the
total reflection of the transmitted pulse, the carrier frequency has to be
below the so-called critical frequency of the F2 layer (<italic>fo</italic>F2). The
minimum value of <italic>fo</italic>F2 in the undisturbed ionosphere lies below
3.5 MHz. That means that with the A1 system at 3.86 MHz, temporarily no
echo is received. Therefore another A1 system at 2.055 MHz was employed.
Unfortunately, the vicinity of the coastal Rügen Radio station (ca.
10 km south) proved to be a disadvantage for the Juliusruh location. The
broadband pulses at 2.055 MHz interfered with the communication between
Rügen Radio and the worldwide operating cargo ships, as well as the
international distress frequency 2.182 MHz.</p>
      <p>During the initial operational period, the technical equipment did not enable
continuous observation in Juliusruh. The reflected signals from the
ionosphere were visualised by means of cathode ray tubes (A-Scopes). At that
time, there was no way to record measurement data on a storage medium.
Sitting at the A-Scope (Figs. 11 and 12), the operator had to read out and to
notify the altitude of the reflecting layer as well as the amplitude of the
reflected pulses. The schedule of A1 measurements during the solar eclipse
provided the readings during periods of a few minutes with large data gaps
(Fig. 13).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>A-Scope with echo signals.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f11.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p>Operator at work.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f12.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p>First results of absorption measurements with the A1 method at
Juliusruh during the solar eclipse of 6 June 1954, 13:00–15:00 GMT.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f13.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><caption><p>The transmitting and receiving antennas were renewed in 1955. Now as
a central pole a 32 m high aluminium tube was erected. It supported the
broadband delta transmitting antenna.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f14.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The ionosonde was – as previously the A1 system – constructed in the
laboratories of the HHI in Berlin. Like the A1 system, the ionosonde employed
pulses that are reflected in the ionosphere. The ionosonde of the HHI
required, for the whole frequency range (1 to 20 MHz), a process time of
10 min. An ionosonde scans the bottom side <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile up to its
maximum; the result is a so-called ionogram. The ionograms of the first
ionosonde in Juliusruh, however, were of poor quality due to the faint HF
power of only 1.7 kW. The antenna too was not optimal for that broad
frequency range.</p>
      <p>After the solar eclipse, operations at Juliusruh Station were continued on
the experimental schedule. The laboratory staff in Berlin worked on improving
the sounding systems and the Juliusruh Station served as a field test site
for the improved equipment. Since the station was not permanently staffed,
the country postman making his daily rounds via bicycle stopped by to check
whether everything was in order.</p>
      <p>In 1955 the HHI decided that Juliusruh Station – initially founded as a
temporary field station – should be included in the observation programme of
HHI for the International Geophysical Year (IGY) 1957/1958. The IGY provided
coordinated geophysical measurements all over the world.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><caption><p>Grounds of the Juliusruh station with the broadband antennas. The
two small squares in the middle indicate the wooden cottages from the
founding year. The main building was established in 1957.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The observation programme had to start on 1 July 1957 and continue for 1
year. The schedule for Juliusruh provided
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>periodical soundings by ionosonde and evaluation of critical frequencies
of the ionospheric E and F layers; and</p></list-item><list-item><p>daily midday acquisition of the ionospheric absorption by vertical
sounding (method A1) at fixed frequencies 2.05 and 3.86 MHz.</p></list-item></list>
The implementation of this programme started at the end of 1955. It was then
decided to continue the observations past the IGY and to maintain Juliusruh
as a fixed ionospheric station.</p>
      <p>In the summer of 1956, the HHI began with the construction of a solid station
building. Unfortunately, the new building was not ready for the start of the
IGY. The station staff had to delay moving into the new facility until
November 1957. The new building contained
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>five bedrooms, one kitchen, and restrooms for the station operators and
periodically visiting HHI staff;</p></list-item><list-item><p>two office rooms;</p></list-item><list-item><p>a photo laboratory, mechanical workshop, and electronic laboratory;</p></list-item><list-item><p>an accumulator room, and a room for power infeed and stabilisation;</p></list-item><list-item><p>a transmitter room in the tower section (ground floor);</p></list-item><list-item><p>Receiver- and observation-room in the tower-section (upper floor).</p></list-item><list-item><p>one apartment for the station's manager;</p></list-item><list-item><p>the attic, first serving as a stockroom. Later, it was partly converted
into workrooms and additional bed-sitting rooms; and</p></list-item><list-item><p>rooms for heating and for drinking water supply.</p></list-item></list>
In order to attenuate the excess heat, radiated by transmitters and receivers
composed of hundreds of electronic tubes, a powerful ventilation/cooling
system was built. All technical rooms were networked with the antenna field
by cable tunnels. The substantial station building (Fig. 47) has satisfied
the requirements for experimental and routine activities to the present day.
When the bedrooms were no longer required, they were converted into office
space.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><caption><p>The ionosonde of HHI operating in Juliusruh, 1956.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f16.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The performance of the ionosonde was boosted by optimising the antennas and
the power of the transmitter from 1.7 to 10 kW. In the summer of 1956 the
improved equipment was tested at Juliusruh Station. Operation of the new
equipment promptly sparked protests on the part of Rügen Radio. They felt
disturbed by the sounding pulses (pulse-wide 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>s, pulse
repetition rate 30 Hz). This was a valid concern because the carrier
frequency during one sounding scrolls through the whole spectrum of medium-
and short-wave radio frequencies. In order to reduce the interference
duration of an ionogram scan, the duration was changed from 10 min down to
25 s. The recording of ionograms was done by a photo recorder.</p>
      <p>For the automatic recording of echo amplitudes from A1 sounding, a photo
recorder with continuous film pull movement was attached to the A-Scope,
enabling continuous recording of the ionospheric absorption data. During
periods when the critical frequency of the F2 layer was below 4 MHz, a
second A1 sounder at 3.18 MHz was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Establishment of a service for warning and reporting of ionospheric
disturbances</title>
      <p>Since 1947, one of the tasks of the HHI – besides the pure research – has
been the prediction of usable frequency bands for short-wave radio
transmission. This working field was of particular interest for the
government bodies. There were 12 customers inside the GDR paying for this
service, among them
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>the state-owned commercial and fishing fleets,</p></list-item><list-item><p>Rügen Radio coastal radio station,</p></list-item><list-item><p>the Radio DDR International broadcast station,</p></list-item><list-item><p>the police,</p></list-item><list-item><p>the military,</p></list-item><list-item><p>the Ministry of State Security, and</p></list-item><list-item><p>the diplomatic service.</p></list-item></list>
The forecasts were compiled by a special procedure, developed already in
World War II, one for each month (Fig. 18). The observations of ionosonde
stations all over the world – among them Juliusruh – were used as input for
the forecast processing (Lange and Tietze, 1963). In 1956, predictions for 40
different short-wave communication lines were compiled.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17"><caption><p>Ionogram at noon, Juliusruh, June 1956.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f17.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In 1957, an additional service was established: the short-term warnings,
labelled by the keyword funkobs. The funkobs was used to inform the customers
of forecasts about an ionospheric disturbance. If this happens, the predicted
frequency band is available only to a limited extent. These warnings were
issued by Juliusruh Station, and they are still a permanent task of the
station.</p>
      <p>To monitor the ionosphere with respect to irregularities, continuous
observation of the geomagnetic field is essential. Electrically charged
particles, moving in the Earth's upper atmosphere and in the near-Earth
space, generate magnetic fields, which then interfere with the permanent
geomagnetic field. That causes geomagnetic variations (Fig. 19). The
permanent flux of particles outgoing from the Sun, the so-called solar wind,
is in interaction with the geomagnetic field. If the solar wind becomes
“squally” by events on the Sun (e.g. proton flares), the geomagnetic field
features typical variations. Subsequently with a time delay of 8 to 36 h,
ionospheric disturbances occur due to the precipitation of particles, an
ionospheric storm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18"><caption><p>An example of forecast, issued by HHI, for short-wave communication
between Berlin and Budapest for September 1962.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f18.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F19" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sudden commencement of geomagnetic storm (SSC), followed by
ionospheric storm. Juliusruh, 28 October 1962.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f19.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Thus the monitoring of the geomagnetic field affords an opportunity to
generate short-term predictions for radio transmission via the ionosphere.
For this reason a fluxgate magnetometer (Förster Probe) was deployed at
Juliusruh Station, using electronic tubes, until 1967. Subsequently a
mechanic field balance system was used (Fanselau, 1962) (Fig. 20). Since 2002
a digital triaxial fluxgate magnetometer has been employed.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F20"><caption><p>Field balance system, developed by Gerhard Fanselau.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f20.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The Mögel–Dellinger effect (MDE) is another type of ionospheric
disturbance (Traxler and Schlegel, 2014). It frequently causes, due to sudden
enhancement of short-wave absorption in the lower ionosphere, a total black
out of ionospheric short-wave transmissions. The origin of this effect is
enhanced X-radiation, emanating from solar flares. As the X-radiation
propagates with the speed of light, this effect occurs coincidentally with a
discovery of the flare by optical observation. As a result, the MDE is
unpredictable. The effect in the ionosphere usually decays after 10 to
20 min.</p>
      <p>In case of unpredictable disturbances, customers are immediately informed
once the disturbances are discovered. For indication of MDE, monitoring the
sky waves of short-wave radio stations is a proven method. Since 1957, the
Juliusruh station has monitored radio station Radio Luxemburg at the
frequency of 6 MHz in search of MDEs. In later years, the monitoring of the
A1 sounding measurements served this purpose.</p>
      <p>In order for an ionospheric disturbance warning to be effectively relayed to
interested customers in time, a staff of permanent operators at the station
is necessary. Thus since 1958 a staff of resident employees has been tasked
with continuous observations and maintenance at the station. The station was
guided both by a physicist and an engineer who arrived from Berlin on a
bi-weekly rotation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F21" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The towers bearing the transmitting and receiving antennas of the
ionosonde, used from 1964. The freestanding central tower stands 70 m high,
and the outer guyed towers stand 52 m high.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f21.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Station Juliusruh after the end of IGY</title>
      <p>After the IGY, Juliusruh had obtained the status of a master station inside
the network of ionosonde stations. Thus its long-term survival was ensured.
From 1959 the official name was Ionospheric Station Juliusruh, as registered
in the international ionosonde network.</p>
      <p>After the great success of the IGY (Taubenheim and Fürstenberg, 1958),
the IUGG (International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics) decided on a new
programme for internationally coordinated observations in the upper
atmosphere, the IQSY (International Quiet Sun Year). According to this
programme, in the years 1964 and 1965 – the period of expected minimum of the solar
activity – intensive observations of the ionosphere with a worldwide unified
schedule were again provided.</p>
      <p>The advances in high-frequency engineering and electronics enabled a lot of
improvement in the observation technique.</p>
      <p>Now ionograms became real-time visible by means of afterglowing screens,
displaying the whole ionogram for nearly 30 s. Previously the ionograms were
in full view only after the film was developed.</p>
      <p>For A1 recording, sample-and-hold circuits were developed for fixing the peak
values of received needle pulses and plotting it with an ink recorder.
Previously the pulses were recorded on photographic film, requiring arduous
scaling work. As the pulse peak of a few microseconds now was stretched up to
minutes, the pulse repetition rate could be reduced from 30 down to 1 Hz. In
this way the continuous disturbance of Rügen Radio and other radio
communication services was considerably diminished.</p>
      <p>In 1960 the HHI began a large-scale effort to optimise the transmitting and
receiving antennas of the different sounders. One free-standing central tower
(1961) standing at 70 m and two wire-supported towers (1964) standing at
52 m were raised (Fig. 21). Since 1964 three nested rhombic loops have been
used with a peak height of 70 m and a maximum horizontal extent of 220 m
for transmitting. During the ionogram scan from 0.5 up 20 MHz, the
transmitting antennas were switched (from large to short) at the frequencies
3.2 and 12 MHz. That way an acceptable resistor-matching between transmitter
and antenna was achieved. The receiving antenna was a delta loop, stretched
orthogonally to the transmitting antenna with a peak height of 70 m, a base
length of 220 m and a base height of 15 m.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F22"><caption><p>In 1960, for the A1 sounders at 3.18 and 3.86 MHz, a freestanding
20 m tower was erected. It carried four half-wave dipoles for transmitting
and receiving. From 1961, the A1 sounders at both frequencies operated
continuously.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f22.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In 1965 the old ionosonde, constructed at the HHI, was replaced by a sounder
of the type SP-3, which was batch-produced by the East Berlin factory
Funkwerk Köpenik for the ionosonde network in the Soviet Union. The
sounder had a pulse power of 50 kW and a frequency range from 0.5 up to
20 MHz.</p>
      <p>The ionograms were photographically recorded (Fig. 23). The ionograms of the
day before had to be processed the next morning after film development and
drying. This process, the so-called scaling of ionograms, took place by means
of an enlarger. To enumerate the standard parameters of the ionogram, the
scaling was done, observing the rules of the URSI (Union Radio Scientifique
Internationale), listed in a special manual (Piggott and Rawer, 1961). Thus
the enumerated standard parameters were comparable to results of stations all
over the world, using the same rules. The scaling results were then
communicated by telex in the form of a so-called URSIGRAM to the World Data
Centers (WDC), where they are available to all scientists.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F23"><caption><p>Ionogram processing by means of enlarger. Type of ionosonde: SP-3,
Juliusruh, 1987.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f23.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In 1965 the Observatorium für Ionosphärenforschung (OIF) in
Kühlungsborn was incorporated into the HHI, and the ionospheric station
of Juliusruh was put under operational and administrative control of the OIF.
Professor Dr. Ernst-August Lauter, previously the director of the OIF, now
became the director of the radio-wave propagation and ionosphere department
of the HHI and graduated to the position of Secretary General of the Academy
of Sciences of the GDR. In 1967 he became director of the HHI. The HHI now
changed its name to Heinrich-Hertz-Institut für solar-terrestrische
Physik, and the Juliusruh station was officially renamed Ionosondenstation
Juliusruh/Rügen.</p>
      <p>From 1963 to 1974 Juliusruh Station also included a former flak tower
(anti-aircraft gun tower) from World War II in the dune area 5 km southward.
At this tower a scientist of the HHI from Berlin conducted applied research
of thermal radiation of objects at sea on behalf of the East German Army.
Those studies most probably served the purpose of discovering political
refugees trying to leave the GDR by boat. This work was top secret, and the
staff of Juliusruh Station had no clearance to access the tower until the end
of the study. Later on, at the radar bogy, an airglow photometer was mounted
by the scientists in Juliusruh for use in Antarctica (see Sect. 7).</p>
      <p>Due to the tense economic situation in the GDR, it was nearly impossible to
hire external contractors for the maintenance and further development of the
station's equipment. Therefore, in Juliusruh, in addition to the head of the
station, who resided inside the station, up to 14 staff members were
employed, residing in the villages near the station. In 1965 the permanent
staff of Juliusruh Station consisted of</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>
            <p>one physicist (head of the station),</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>one engineer,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>one radio technician,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>four observers, working in shifts,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>two grounds keepers,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>one metal worker and stoker,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>two house cleaners,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>one cook,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>one administrator, and</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>one person for measurement data evaluation.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list>Additionally, up to three students, PhD candidates, and interns from the
universities of Rostock or Greifswald were living and working in the station.
Temporary personnel were dispatched from the HHI in Berlin and
Kühlungsborn for the implementation of new experiments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F24"><caption><p>One of the observers (right) and the author (hanging) mounting the
feeders for the ionosonde antenna (1965).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f24.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The power grid connection (50 Hz) of the village of Juliusruh before 1980
was deficient. The AC voltage sometimes was only 190 V instead of 220 V.
Therefore inside the station a second power grid was installed for the
electronic equipment. It was stabilised by means of automatically working
adjustable transformers. During the frequent gales – the Wittow Peninsula in
the vernacular is called “Windland” – the local power grid often
collapsed. Thus an emergency power aggregate was acquired. It was an old one,
made in the UK, which had already been used for years in the Werner
Seelenbinder Hall, the biggest East Berlin multipurpose hall. Unfortunately
this generator equipment never ran due to the lack of spare parts. Later a
new generator made in the GDR could be purchased.</p>
      <p>The building for the power generator moonlighting was built by the
“Feierabend-Brigade” of the station. The Feierabend-Brigade was a layman
workers unit, consisting of nearly the whole staff of Juliusruh Station,
including the author, working for money in their free time. In East Germany,
professional construction companies worked preferably for military or
economically important projects. As a result, the Feierabend-Brigade was a
common phenomenon all over the GDR. Our Feierabend-Brigade was engaged until
the eighties for different tasks, such as building reconstruction, roadway
clearances and laying of cable on the property. Each end of project was
heartily celebrated (Fig. 25).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F25"><caption><p>The “Feierabend-Brigade” of Juliusruh Station celebrates the
completion of a pathway trough the compound with a celebratory drive.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f25.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>International communication was seriously restricted in the GDR. The TELEX
network for communication with Western countries – “capitalist countries”
in official speech – was blocked, and the HHI had to obtain exceptional
permission from the post ministry for the station of Juliusruh. A condition
for that permission was to bar the windows on the ground floor of the station
building to avoid the use of TELEX by intruders. That problem could be fixed
by moving the TELEX equipment into a room on the second floor of the tower
section and keeping it closed. This room was previously used as a photo
laboratory each night to develop 15 m of ionogram film. Again, the
Feierabend-Brigade was asked to convert the former TELEX room on the ground
floor into a photo laboratory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Wildlife inside of the station compound</title>
      <p>The whole compound of the station was fenced in, and at the entrance gates
visitors were warned by danger signs against high voltages and falling parts
of antennas. Nevertheless, vacationers during the summertime intruded into
the compound. This changed drastically when additional signs from the nature
conservation authority were attached, asking visitors not to harass the black
adders (Fig. 26) living inside the compound.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F26"><caption><p>A black coloured adder (Hell Adder). This species lives in the
compound, deterring the vacationers from intruding.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f26.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F27"><caption><p>Wildlife inside of the sheltered station compound.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f27.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F28"><caption><p>Wildlife inside of the sheltered station compound.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f28.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F29"><caption><p>Wildlife inside of the sheltered station compound.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f29.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F30"><caption><p>Wildlife inside of the sheltered station compound.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f30.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Besides adders, several other wild animals also live inside the fenced
station grounds (Figs. 27 to 30). But one ubiquitous species is strangely
absent from the Wittow Peninsula: the mole. Throughout the rest of Rügen,
the mole is a pest. The tour guides like to explain the absence of moles to
their clients by a miracle of Saint George, whose statue is located inside
the church of Wiek in Wittow. We think we have discovered the mystery by
accident.</p>
      <p>After a light Earth tremor on 5 May 1981 with the epicentre north of
Rügen, the Potsdam Central Institute for Physics of the Earth intended to
install a seismometer in the Juliusruh Station area, to fill a gap in the
seismographical network. But test measurements showed a permanent high
microseismic level all over the peninsula, obstructing useful operation of a
seismic station. Thus the station with international stations code GE-LID was
established in Liddow in the core of Rügen.</p>
      <p>The cause of this microseismic activity in the Wittow Peninsula seems to be
the continuous beating of sea waves against the shore in connection with a
special tectonic structure of the subsoil.</p>
      <p>The sensitivity of moles to special infrasonic frequencies is well known.
Obviously the microseismic spectrum in Wittow contains these frequencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Antarctic expeditions</title>
      <p>In 1974 and 1975 the Juliusruh station made significant contributions to the
research programme and the equipment of the East German participation in the
21st, 22nd and 23rd Soviet Antarctic Expeditions (SAE). For the first time,
in 1975 a German station was founded in Antarctica, initially as an outpost
of the New Lazarev Soviet Antarctic station. Afterwards the German station
was named Station Georg Forster. The author as the head of Juliusruh Station
was assigned by the administration of the HHI to design the scientific
observations and to lead the German expedition group. The state security
service of the GDR blocked his participation only a few months before the
start. This job then was given to physicist Dr. Hartwig Gernandt of the
Lindenberg Meteorological Observatory. After his participation in the 13th
Soviet Antarctic Expedition he had written his doctor dissertation at
Juliusruh Station between 1969 and 1971 (Gernandt, 1971). He was familiar
with the scheduled observation technique. The programme in Antarctica
included vertical ionospheric sounding and airglow measurements, using
equipment from Juliusruh.</p>
      <p>The Soviet station at ca. 2 km distance provided the meals and medical
assistance for the German group. The Germans had to support themselves with
other needs, like lodging, power, and radio communication with home. The
logistical arrangements in the GDR were made by the National Committee of
Geodesy and Geophysics (NKGG) of the Academy of Science. Several 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
containers were purchased for lodging, laboratory and power supply. Moreover,
two crawler tractors were acquired for trekking the containers over the shelf
ice (Fig. 31). As a joke, the German expedition participants named the
tractors “Ernst August” and “Bodo” after the two protagonists
Ernst August Lauter (director of HHI) and Bodo Tripphahn (NKGG).</p>
      <p>Some of the containers were completely equipped in Juliusruh Station. The
blacksmith in a nearby village had constructed heavy iron sledges for
crossing the Antarctic ice shelf while moving equipment. The antenna with a
wire-supported mast of 30 m was erected and tested in the compound of
Juliusruh Station. The expedition participants were trained here on the
equipment before the expedition began.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F31"><caption><p>Unloading upon the Antarctic ice shelf.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f31.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F32"><caption><p>German station near New Lazarew.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f32.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Between 1975 and 1979 staff members of Juliusruh overwintered in Antarctica
repeatedly. The embarkment started in October 1975 in Leningrad on the
<italic>Kapitan Markov</italic> ice-breaking freighter. The A1 sounder, already
installed ready-to-operate in Juliusruh in one of the containers, was located
on the deck of <italic>Kapitan Markov</italic> and used for ionospheric absorption
measurement during the passage to Antarctica, to get a meridional profile. In
March 1976 the cargo was unloaded from the ship onto the ice shelf, and from
that point the cargo had to be transported on ice 90 km to the Schirrmacher
Oasis in the south-eastern Antarctic (Gernandt, 1984). There the containers
were collocated for the first German Antarctic research station (Fig. 32).
Operations began on 21 April 1976.</p>
      <p>In 1976 the changeover crew in Leningrad embarked on the <italic>Penjina</italic>
ice-breaking freighter. Once again a 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> container, equipped with another
A1 sounder, was located on deck. The periodically changing crews operated
that sounder during the voyages down to Antarctica and back to Europe
(Fig. 33) (Bremer et al., 1980).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F33"><caption><p>Absorption at 2 MHz and cos <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: solar zenith
angle) onboard ship and at Juliusruh Station; scales at the top: geographic
latitudes of the ships.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f33.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8">
  <title>Further development of sounding by A1 and ionosonde</title>
      <p>Beginning in 1967, the focus of ionospheric research of the HHI changed to
the area below 100 km in altitude. In the ionosphere, this is the range of
the D layer and the nighttime E layer. These layers were only detectable via
indirect sounding employing the classic sounding methods applied in
Juliusruh, using the total reflection from the F layers and the daytime
E layer. In the case of total reflection, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile below the
reflecting layer causes a power attenuation of sounding signals. There was an
attempt at continuously recording the signal power of the reflected ionosonde
signals, similar to the A1 method, but the technical complexity exceeded the
station's capabilities. Another parameter of the ionogram, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(the minimum frequency, where an echo is visible in the ionogram), which is
regularly scaled from the ionogram, is suitable for comparative study of
absorption in the lower ionosphere. Due to the high efficiency of the
Juliusruh ionosonde, the nighttime echo trace already began at 500 kHz, the
starting frequency of the ionosonde. Therefore, the nighttime values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were unusable. By employing technical changes the starting
frequency could be reduced down to 180 kHz. Now the nighttime values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were suitable for the calculation of absorption. In addition,
echoes of the nighttime E layer from 90 km now could be temporarily measured.
With this starting frequency, Juliusruh had a unique position in the
worldwide network of ionosondes, whose starting frequencies mostly were
1 MHz.</p>
      <p>In the late sixties, analogue and digital semiconductors became available in
the GDR. The new electronic components were utilised in Juliusruh to automate
the observation service. The station developed its own alarm system
(Weiß, 1972) and could substitute the night shift with a stand-by duty
from 1970 onwards. The alarm was not only set off by fire or burglar entry,
but also by sudden storm commencements (SSC) (Sect. 4) and sudden ionospheric
disturbances (SID). In order to generate the alarm trigger for SSC and SID,
the magnetometer and the A1 sounder were supplemented by threshold switches.</p>
      <p>Damaging by lightning was a common problem after the replacement of
electronic tubes and electromagnetic relays by semiconductors. The large
antennas are predestined for discharging of atmospheric electricity. So all
elevated antennas are grounded by motor-operated switches if a thunderstorm
approaches. During the first few years the groundings were triggered manually
by operator. Later on, this was done by a threshold switch, connected to a
VLF receiver (500 Hz), watching the level of atmospheric noise.
Nevertheless, in a few cases damage occurred due to induction into the
interface cables if lightning struck the grounded antennas. This problem
could be fixed in the nineties by installing protection in the form of
overvoltage fuses on each interface cable that measures 20 m or more.</p>
      <p>In the seventies the development of digital techniques enabled new
conceptions for the recording and analysis of data. Unfortunately the
laboratories of the HHI in Berlin were outsourced into the new founded
Institute of Electronics (later renamed Zentralinstitut für
Kosmosforschung) of the AdW. In the HHI remained only a small technical
department. So the automation and further development of the observation
techniques was a task which the staff of Juliusruh had to perform on their
own. For this task the professionally qualified staff members attended
courses for hardware developers. Suchlike and other courses were periodically
offered by the educational institution of the AdW.</p>
      <p>The recording of ionograms still took place photographically at Juliusruh
Station during this time. In 1977 a special device for ionogram scaling was
constructed. It enabled one to key in and record the scaling code on punch
tape. The code consists of a three-digit number among two letters, the
so-called ionospheric alphabet. Both the keyboard and the display were made
in the small workshop of Juliusruh Station. The display was a mix of glow
discharge tubes and light-emitting diodes. Subsequently all of the standard
parameters of the Juliusruh ionograms were available machine-readable.</p>
      <p>A monthly recurrent task was the preparation of the measurement results for
publication in Geohysikalische Beobachtungsergebnisse des HHI, ready to
print. This time-consuming job – including the enumeration of median and
quartile values – now could be done by computer.</p>
      <p>In 1978 the Juliusruh station got a secondhand computer (GDR-made type D4A)
which was used in HHI Kühlungsborn before. It was so large that a special
room had to be prepared. This computer room was comprised of two former
lodging rooms by removing an interior wall. Again, this job was done by the
already mentioned Feierabend-Brigade. The computer programs had to be written
in absolute code as the memory was not sufficient for the use of assembler or
compiler languages. The development of computer programs as well as the
continuous further development of the observation technique rested on the
physicists employed in Juliusruh, and they liked this multitasking job.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S9">
  <title>Other observation methods used temporarily at Juliusruh Station</title>
      <p>Due to the focus of research of the HHI into the atmosphere below 90 km,
different methods were experimented with in the station to obtain data from
this area.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S9.SS1">
  <title>Optometry</title>
      <p>Inside the mesopause, an atmospheric range between 80 and 90 km above
ground, noctilucent clouds (NLC) are sometimes visible. In the period from
1967 until 1972, attempts were made to gauge the structure of NLC and their
movement using photogrammetry (Auff'm Ordt, 1973). For this purpose, cameras
were positioned in a triangle at these locations (see Fig. 34):
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Juliusruh Station,</p></list-item><list-item><p>Lighthouse Dornbusch (Hiddensee), and</p></list-item><list-item><p>Lighthouse Ranzow (Jasmund Peninsula).</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F34"><caption><p>NLC observation network. a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.7 km, b <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.5 km and
c <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33.3 km.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f34.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The cameras were triggered manually by operators, receiving the trigger
command via VLF radio. The measurements aimed at the study of energy flux by
waves visible in the NLC. In several cases, jet streams are the presumed
origin of the observed waves. An unambiguous relationship could not be
verified in all cases.</p>
      <p>Another experiment, aimed at measuring waves in the atmosphere, was started
on this photogrammetry site: the gauging of wave structures in condensation
trails of jets in the stratosphere. Such waves sometimes are visible if the
lifetime of the trails is longer than usual, depending on the atmospheric
conditions. Those observations principally could be used to record the
motions of military jets. This was inadmissible for the HHI civil
institution, and therefore the experiment had to be aborted.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S9.SS2">
  <title>Low-frequency sounder</title>
      <p>In 1967, a low-frequency sounder was activated in the Kühlungsborn
Observatory for research of the altitude range below 100 km. The parameters
of the transmitter are the following:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>frequency 314 kHz,</p></list-item><list-item><p>HF power 50 kW,</p></list-item><list-item><p>pulse-wide 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>s, and</p></list-item><list-item><p>pulse repetition frequency 12.5 Hz.</p></list-item></list>
The signals were received in Juliusruh. For receiving, a delta antenna was
built with</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F35"><caption><p>NLC, observed from Juliusruh, 2 July 1967.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f35.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p><list list-type="bullet">
            <list-item>
              <p>peak height of 52 m,</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>base length of 440 m, and</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>base height of 6 m.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list>The receiver was designed in Kühlungsborn using the newest components
then available in the GDR like MOS-FETs and mechanical band filters. Both the
signal amplitude and the travel-time delay of the sky wave were recorded. The
raw synchronisation was done by the AC powernet and the fine sychronisation
by the received ground-wave pulses. The time delay was recorded
photographically and the amplitude was recorded by ink recorder on paper. The
experiment was carried out from 1968 up to 1971 (Weiß, 1973).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S9.SS3">
  <title>Observation of gravity waves by microbarograph array</title>
      <p>In 1982 an array of three microbarographs for the observation of acoustic
gravity waves in the troposphere was installed (Neisser, 2009). It was
designed and constructed by the department of aeronomy of the HHI, using
modified capacitor microphones for measuring air pressure oscillations with
periods of 1 s up to 60 min (Stangenberg, 1986). Three sensors were located
in vats 1.5 m in the ground, arranged in a triangle of 2.3 km, to acquire
the propagation vectors. The devices were located in the station compound and
in the nearby villages of Breege and Altenkirchen.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F36"><caption><p>Geometry of the microbarograph network.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f36.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Data were transmitted by VLF radio from the remote locations to the station
of Juliusruh. The data were captured by a microprocessor system and stored on
punch tape. The array was supplemented by meteorological sensors on the 70 m
tower. This system was operated and maintained continuously by the staff of
the station until 1991.</p>
      <p>In 1990 a cooperation in measuring of gravity waves was started between the
HHI and the DLR, Institute of Physics of Atmosphere (Oberpfaffenhofen). In
this framework in 1991–1992, the experiences at the Juliusruh station were
the basis for the construction of a copy of the Juliusruh gravity network
type in Upper Bavaria at the Lichtenau satellite station (Hauf et al., 1996).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S9.SS4">
  <title>Vertical SODAR</title>
      <p>In 1984 a vertical SODAR, called ECHO-1, was designed by the department of
aeronomy of the HHI. From 1985 until 1987 this device was tested in Juliusruh
(Neisser et al., 1988). The sonic pulses at the frequency of 1.666 kHz were
radiated from a horn speaker. The directional effect was achieved by means of
a 2 m parabolic mirror, located on the bottom of a 3.5 m high funnel cask.
The cask was lined by sound-absorbing material to shield it from noise. The
echoes, coming back from up to 1600 m, were recorded in the first stage by
ink recorder.</p>
      <p>At first only temperature inversions were recorded. The system was already
prepared with bandpass filters for wind calculation by means of the Doppler
shift. This first device was the basic module for the later model: a triple
Doppler SODAR. After the end of the test measurements the vertical SODAR in
Juliusruh was kept operational until it was destroyed by a lightning strike
in 1995.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F37"><caption><p>Vertical SODAR ECHO-1 at the Marburg Ground Truth and Profiling
Station, Marburg University, LCRS.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f37.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S9.SS5">
  <title>LIDAR</title>
      <p>In November 1995 the LIDAR labelled HERMES of the French Service d'Aeronomie
du CNRS was transferred from Observatoire du Haute Provence to Juliusruh
Station. Here it was operated by the staff of Juliusruh until 1997. The LIDAR
was directed vertically and used a ND:YAG laser (wavelength 532 nm) with
500 mJ pulse power and 30 Hz pulse repetition frequency.</p>
      <p>The equipment was installed inside a 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> container and acquired data from
15 up to 95 km in altitude. The instrument was operational at night. The
condition of a cloudless sky is often fulfilled on the Wittow Peninsula, so
the LIDAR could operate on average 1 of 3 nights. The aviation authority made
a request that the station staff switch off the laser when airplanes fly by
in the area. For this purpose, a yacht radar was altered so that the antenna
beam was directed 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> up. The built-in target watch then was used to
switch off the laser automatically.</p>
      <p>The HERMES LIDAR i.a. was used for observations of NLC. The example in
Fig. 38 shows backscattering of NLC over Juliusruh during a field campaign
that proceeded from May to August 1995. The weather conditions in this period
allowed operations during 40 nights with the LIDAR. In three of them, NLC
were observed. The optical NLC observations of the weather station on Cape
Arkona, at a distance of 10 km, validated the LIDAR results (von Cossart et
al., 1996).</p>
      <p>Besides the HERMES LIDAR, another LIDAR system, using two dye lasers, in
Juliusruh, was established and tested by two colleagues of Kühlungsborn.
For this purpose a special annex to the station was built. In 1996 this LIDAR
system was moved to Kühlungsborn into the new building of the IAP
(Institut für Atmosphärenphysik, Sect. 2). The attached building in
Juliusruh was then removed.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F38"><caption><p>NLC over Juliusruh observed by HERMES-LIDAR, July 1995.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f38.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S10">
  <title>MF radar</title>
      <p>Since 1973 at the HHI, a MF radar has been developed for partial reflections
from the ionospheric range below 90 km. In contrast to the total reflection
in the E and F layers, observed by ionosonde and A1 sounders, the MF radar
was designed for detection of weak echoes, partially reflected from
ionisation irregularities in the altitude above 50 km. The system used
frequency modulated continuous waves (FMCW) for transmitting and receiving.
The frequency continuously rose during a sounding burst of 0.6 s. The travel
time of the signal up and back is calculated from the frequency shift of the
transmitter compared to the received signal. With this method a coherent
summation is possible, and the signal-to-noise ratio is improved
substantially. So the very weak partial reflections can be detected, even
though the amplitudes are 50 to 80 dB below those of the total reflected
signals. The MF radar (mean frequency 3.18 MHz) had a transmitting power of
10 kW.</p>
      <p>The transmitting antenna was an array of 16 crossed half-wave dipoles
(Franklin Antenna System), clamped on wooden stakes at a height of 11 m
(Fig. 43). Crossed loop antennas clamped on wooden stakes of 12 m (Fig. 40)
served for receiving. The spacing between transmitting and receiving antennas
had to be as wide as possible. Those weatherproof loop antennas were formerly
used on ships for radio orientation. The antennas were purchased from the
remainder of the state shipping company of the GDR.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F39"><caption><p>The green beam of HERMES.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f39.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>At that time no digital computers were available for real-time Fourier
analysis. As an alternative, during the first stage measurements, narrow-band
filters for analogue spectrum analysis were used. Due to the complex primary
data processing and the problems getting the needed processing equipment (at
that time a high-tech embargo against the Eastern bloc was in force), the
system could not be put into operation before 8 years of development
(Figs. 41 and 42).</p>
      <p>The data of MF radar were recorded on magnetic cartridge tape. Later on, at
the end of the eighties, a digital Fourier processor at the base of TTL-IC
was available for the primary data processing. In 1992 a IBM PC with an i486
CPU was used for this task. Only then did the MF radar produce acceptable
results. With this configuration, it operated until 2003.</p>
      <p>In 2003 the transmitter and the receiver of the MF radar were substituted by
equipment of Australian producer ATRAD, and the system was changed from FMCW
to pulse operation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F40"><caption><p>Loop antenna clamped on a wooden stake.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f40.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F41"><caption><p>Prof. Dr. Jens Taubenheim sets in operation the MF radar, Juliusruh,
1982.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f41.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F42"><caption><p>The new MF radar, 1982.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f42.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In 2005 the radar was substituted by a new modular system with active phase
array antennas, arranged in the form of a Mills cross. Since then, the radar
has operated with a pulse-peak power of 64 kW at the old frequency
3.18 MHz.</p>
      <p>The Mills cross transmitting antenna consists of 13 half-wave dipole crosses
(Fig. 44). Each single dipole is connected to a separate
transmitter–receiver unit. By means of phase-shifted feeding it is possible
to operate circular polarisation and to swing the beam. By measuring the
Doppler shift as a function of the beam angle (Doppler beam swinging, DBS),
the movement of the reflecting plasma between 70 and 95 km in altitude in
steps of 4 km is computable. Because of the coupling between neutral gas and
plasma, the wind in a limited circle around the station is obtained in that
altitude range.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S11">
  <title>SKYMET meteor radar</title>
      <p>Beginning in November 1999, the Juliusruh station operated an all-sky meteor
radar called SKYMET. The echoes of ionisation tracks, generated by meteorites
burning up in the Earth's atmosphere, are received (Fig. 43, blue) by a
five-antenna interferometer (Jones et al., 1998), resulting in a range
accuracy of 2 km and an angular accuracy of better than 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in meteor
location. Meteor observations have been performed at a frequency of
32.55 MHz with a pulse repetition frequency of 2144 Hz, a pulse width of
13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>s (Gaussian shape), and a peak power of 12 kW. The signals are
reflected by ionisation traces from meteors in the altitude area between 80
and 110 km. The total meteor count rates of unambiguous detections vary
throughout the year between 100 and 500 meteors per hour.</p>
      <p>With respect to the Doppler shift of the echoes, the wind field in the
reflection area can be determined. Moreover, the temperature of the neutral
gas is derived from the decay time of the echoes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F43"><caption><p>Position of the antennas in Juliusruh Station. The Franklin array
(top right) 2004 was substituted by a Mills cross array.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f43.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In August 2002 the SKYMET was transferred to the Andoya Space Centre in
Norway (Singer et al., 2004). There the IAP, together with universities and
institutes of eight countries, operates the Arctic Lidar Observatory for
Middle Atmosphere Research (ALOMAR). Since 2007 a new SKYMET has operated in
Juliusruh at two frequencies: 32.55 and 53.5 MHz. The actual number and
direction of the meteor echoes is published daily on the internet home page
of IAP (Fig. 45).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F44"><caption><p>Mills cross MF antenna (red).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f44.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F45"><caption><p>Number, direction and altitude of the meteor echoes, recorded in
Juliusruh for the last 48 h on 31 March 2015.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f45.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S12" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Ionosonde and the forecast of radio-wave propagation conditions
after 1990</title>
      <p>In 1990, the year of Germany's reunification, the closure of the East Berlin
Heinrich-Hertz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik was foreseeable, and
the future of all the research themes and observation programmes became
uncertain. The continuity of an ionosonde in Juliusruh was soon confirmed. A
closure would have left a wide gap in the ionosonde network. The continued
existence was strongly recommended by URSI, following a suggestion of Dr. K.
Schlegel of the Max Planck Institute for Aeronomy Lindau/Germany.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F46" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Ionogram by DPS-4D, Juliusruh, 31 March 2015. On the left side some
of the automatically scaled characteristics. The black trace is the
real-height profile of the plasma frequency, calculated from the ionogram in
real time.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f46.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Besides the continuous operation of the ionsonde, some new projects of
environmental monitoring had been contemplated, especially a DOAS station
under the auspices of Heidelberg University. DOAS is a method to determine
concentrations of trace gases by measuring their specific narrow-band
absorption structures in the UV and visible spectral region (Platt, 1994). A
former watch tower of the East German border patrol seemed well suited for
the reflection point of the DOAS path. It was freely visible from the station
at a distance of 7 km, and the path would cross the Tromper Wiek bay.
Precautionary security of the tower was ensured by the staff of Juliusruh to
prevent demolition by the people as a symbol of the bondage in the former
GDR. However, the plan was rejected in mid-1992 by the director of the newly
established IAP, because of concerns over incompatibility with the provided
LIDAR observations.</p>
      <p>In March 1990 a digital ionosonde was set into operation, developed and built
in Poland under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences, called KOS.
The ionosonde was controlled by a PC, and the ionograms were recorded onto a
3.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> magnetic disk. The old ionosonde (type SP-3) was deactivated. The KOS
had a transmitting power of 15 kW and a frequency range of 1.5 to 20 MHz,
scanned in steps of 50 kHz. For the scaling of ionograms, a semi-automatic
ionogram scaling procedure was developed at Juliusruh, using C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coding.
This software made it possible for the arduous calculation tasks to be made
by PC, hitherto carried out by a full-time equivalent.</p>
      <p>Together with the end of the GDR state the previous frequency approvals of
all the transmitters in Juliusruh became void. With the now applicable
regulations the admission was doubtful. This concerned especially the KOS
ionosonde, producing a broad noise spectrum. A provisional approval was
granted only for a transition period. In 1994 the sounder was moved to the
island of Andoya in Norway. There it became a part of ALOMAR, using the
location of a former DECCA station with a 140 m antenna tower.</p>
      <p>In West Germany, like in East Germany, existing users of frequency
predictions for radio communication still had their requirements. The
forecasts were issued by the research institute of the German Bundespost,
subsequently named TELEKOM, in Darmstadt. The required database was produced
by TELEKOM's own ionosonde, with the transmitter located in Elmshorn near
Hamburg and the receiver in Sankt Peter-Ording about 100 km north of the
transmitter. After German reunification, the Juliusruh ionosonde took over
the role of data supply, whereas TELEKOM still issued the forecasts. The
program system for the forecast calculation of TELEKOM was developed by
Dr. Thomas Damboldt.</p>
      <p>In 1992 TELEKOM and the IAP contracted the analysis of the Juliusruh
ionograms of the last 20 years. The goal was a trustworthy automatically
issued forecast of short-term deviations of the F2 layer critical frequency
based on real-time geomagnetic field data. The resulting algorithms were
developed and successfully tested in Juliusruh until 1994.</p>
      <p>TELEKOM ceased the forecast service completely by the end of 1993.
Consequently the main customer of the forecasts, the German Bundeswehr,
concluded a contract with IAP, valid from 1994. The monthly forecasts were
still calculated by Dr. Thomas Damboldt, now as a private subcontractor of
IAP, whereas Juliusruh issued the short-term predictions.</p>
      <p>In 1992 TELEKOM released their ionosonde to Juliusruh. First only the
receiver from Sankt Peter-Ording was transferred; the transmitter remained in
Elmshorn. The ionosonde, a CHIRP-SOUNDER produced by BARRY RESEARCH in
California, was of current interest for the Juliusruh station, because the
KOS ionosonde presumably would not get a permanent frequency approval. The
CHIRP-SOUNDER uses the CW technique (Sect. 10) and had a power of only 5 W,
or alternatively 100 W (switchable). However, it is usable only in bi-static
operation: between the locations of the transmitter and receiver, there has
to be a distance of several kilometres. The receiver was operated in
Juliusruh by test until 1994. Then TELEKOM also released the transmitter to
the IAP.</p>
      <p>In 1994 the IAP bought a digital ionosonde system from the Center for
Atmospheric Research (UMLCAR) at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. This
Digisonde Portable Sounder (DPS-1) was developed by Bodo Reinisch and Mark
Haines and has a transmitting power of 150 W and a transmission bandwidth of
30 kHz (Reinisch et al., 1992). It uses a 16-bit phase-coded pulse and pulse
compression and coherent spectral integration to assure a high
signal-to-noise ratio. The system progresses continuously, and the UMLCAR
holds a bi-annual seminar for Digisonde users, which is faithfully attended
by the Juliusruh engineer responsible for the sounding operation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F47"><caption><p>Juliusruh Station today.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f47.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The DPS has the capability to transmit right- and left-hand circularly
polarised waves. For this purpose the transmitting antenna on the 70 m tower
was renovated in early 1995. The antenna, developed by the American NBS,
consists of two crossed rhombuses. As the horizontal extent is only 40 m, no
additional masts are needed to stretch the antenna wires. So the outer 52 m
masts were removed, which, together with the 70 m tower, had characterised
the appearance of Juliusruh Station to that point. The DPS uses for receiving
four crossed-loop antennas near the ground.</p>
      <p>In 1999 the DPS was shipped back to UMLCAR for upgrading from DPS-1 to DPS-4.
The upgraded sounder had four receivers, one for each of the received
antennas, reducing the acquisition time for angle arrival measurements by a
factor of 4. During the 3-month absence of the DPS, the CHIRP-SOUNDER was
reactivated in order to continue the required frequency prediction services.
Because this sounder has to be operated bi-statically, the transmitter was
located in Juliusruh and connected to the transmitting antenna of the DPS,
and the receiver in the village of Wiek, in the backyard of the author. The
data transfer was achieved by telephone modem. The last upgrade of the DPS-4
to a DPS-4D took place in 2011. The DPS-4D runs the significantly improved
ARTIST 5 autoscaling system. Precise internal timing and GPS synchronisation
(Reinisch et al., 2009) enable by exact synchronisation the receiving of
oblique incidence ionograms, transmitted by equally equipped stations in a
circle of more than 500 km.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F48"><caption><p>Juliusruh Station today.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/7/1/2016/hgss-7-1-2016-f48.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>As described above, the history of Juliusruh Station is closely related to
the evolution of ionosondes over the last 60 years. The very first ionosonde
in Juliusruh only enabled the capture of standard ionospheric characteristics
with considerable manual scaling effort after film development. The current
system now supplies, in real time,
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>amplitude,</p></list-item><list-item><p>phase,</p></list-item><list-item><p>Doppler shift,</p></list-item><list-item><p>incidence angle, and</p></list-item><list-item><p>polarisation</p></list-item></list>
of the reflected waves, together with the autoscaled ionospheric
characteristics and the electron density profile. This enables the monitoring
and research of the structure and dynamics of the ionospheric plasma over a
large height range. Nevertheless we must not underestimate the importance of
the simple old hand-scaled ionospheric characteristics for ionospheric and
environmental research. The URSI INAG (Ionosonde Network Advisory Group)
working group had initiated and monitored the unified scaling of ionograms in
the worldwide ionosonde network at an early stage, making the results
comparable. Many of the old data stocks have been digitised and collected in
publicly accessible data centres, providing a valuable basis for the
discovery of long-term environmental changes.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><?xmltex \bgroup\small?> Edited by: K. Schlegel<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: B. W. Reinisch and J. Taubenheim<?xmltex \egroup?></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Auff'm Ordt, N.: Der Nachweis von Wellen in der Mesopause und deren
möglichen Quellen, Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Rostock, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Böhm, S., Pöschel, E., and Sommer, M.: Adlershofer Splitter 2, WITEGA
e.V., Berlin, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Breit, G. and Tuve, M. A.: A Radio Method of Estimating the Height of the
Conducting Layer, Nature, 116, 357 pp., 1925.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bremer, J., Gernandt, H., and Lucke, H.: Global Ionospheric Absorption
Measurements on Bord Ships, Gerlands Beitr. Geophysik, Leipzig, 89, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Fanselau, G.: Geomagnetische Feldwaagen, Z. Angew. Geol., 8, Heft 2, 62–64,
1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Gauss, C. F.: Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus, puplished in: Resultate
aus den Beobachtungen des Magnetischen Vereins im Jahre 1838, Weidmannsche
Verlagsbuchhandlung, Leipzig, 1839.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Gernandt, H.: Ionosphärische Anomalien in hohen geomagnetischen Breiten,
Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Rostock, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Gernandt, H.: Erlebnis Antarktis, Transpress VEB Verlag für
Verkehrswesen, 229–270, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Hauf, T., Finke, U., Neisser, J., Bull, G., and Stangenberg, J.-G.: A
Ground-Based Network for Atmospheric Pressure Fluctuations, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 13, 1001–1023, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, W., Webster, A. R., and Hocking, W. K.: An improved interferometer
design for use with meteor radars, Radio Sci., 33, 55–65, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Lange, H. and Tietze, H.: Wetterfrösche für Kurzwellen,
Militärverlag, Berlin, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Neisser, J.: Experimental Investigations of Atmospheric Gravity Waves,
Reports on polar and marine research, 588, 73–79, Alfred Wegner Institute,
Beremerhaven, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Neisser, J., Bull, G., Evers, K. Weimann, M., Weiß, E., Keder, J., and
Petenko, I. V.: Results of SODAR Investigantion of the Planetary Boundary
Layer, Proc. Field Exper. KOPEX-86, Institute of Physics of the Atmosphere of
Czech. Acad. Sc., Prague, 109–141, 1988.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Piggott, W. R. and Rawer, K.: URSI Handbook of Ionogram Interpretation and
Reduction, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, U.: Differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS), Chem. Anal.
Series, 127, 27–83, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Rawer, K.: Die Ionosphäre, Groningen, Noordhoff, 189 pp., 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Rawer, K. and Suchy, K.: Radio Observations of the Ionosphere, in: Handbuch
der Physik, V.49/2, Springer, Berlin, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Reinisch, B. W., Haines, D. M., and Kuklinski, W. S.: The New Portable
Digisonde for Vertical and Oblique Sounding, AGARD-CP-502, February 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Reinisch, B. W., Galkin, I. A., Khmyrov, A. V., Kozlov, A. V., Bibl, K.,
Lisysyan, I. A., Cheney, G. P., Huang, X., Kitrosser, D. F., Paznukhov, V.
V., Luo, Y., Stelmasch, S., Hamel, R., and Grochmal, R.: New Digisonde for
research and minitoring applications, Radio Sci., 44, RS0A24,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008RS004115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008RS004115</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Schlegel, K. and Lühr, H.: Willy Stoffregen – An early pioneer of
advanced ionospheric and auroral research, Hist. Geo Space. Sci., 5,
149–154, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hgss-5-149-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hgss-5-149-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Singer, W., Bremer, J., Weiß, J., Hocking, W. K., Höffner, J.,
Donner, M., and Espy, P.: Meteor radar observations at middle and Arctic
latitudes, Part 1: mean temperatures, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 66,
607–616, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2004.01.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2004.01.012</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Stangenberg, J.-G.: Anordnung zur Messung geringer atmosphärischer
Druckvariationen, DDR Wirtschaftspatent, DD GO1L/236170C, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Traxler, F. and Schlegel, K.: Hans Mögel, Transradio, and the Mögel
Dellinger Effect, Radio Science Bulletin, 351, 53–57, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Taubenheim, J.: The influence of solar flares on the ionospheric E layer, J.
Atmos. Terr. Phys., 11, 14–22, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Taubenheim, J. and Fürstenberg, F.: Das Heinrich-Hertz-Institut im
Internationalen Geophysikalischen Jahr, Wiss. u. Fortschr., 8, 145–149,
1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>von Cossart, G., Hoffmann, P., von Zahn, U., Keckhut, P., and Hauchecorne,
A.: Mid-latitude noctilucent cloud observations by lidar, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 23, 2919–2922, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96GL02768" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96GL02768</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Weiß, E.: Methode und Ergebnisse der ionosphärischen Impulslotung
mittels elektromagentischer Wellen auf 314.5 kHz und 185 kHz,
Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Rostock, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Weiß, J.: Überwachung elektronischer Anlagen durch eine Feuer- und
Havarie-Meldeanlage, Wissenschaftlich-technische Beilage 8/1972 der
Zeitschrift “Unser Brandschutz”, Staatsverlag der DDR, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>History of the Juliusruh ionospheric observatory
on Rügen</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The history of the Juliusruh ionospheric observatory on Rügen is closely
connected to the history of ground-based ionospheric sounding. After a short
introduction to the ionospheric research and the sounding technique, the
founding of the Juliusruh station in 1954 and its development until today are
described. The different methods of ground-based sounding – as far as they
apply to Juliusruh – are briefly discussed. The condition of life and work
in a small team on the island of Rügen, remote from the respective parent
institute, is also the subject of this article, whose author headed Juliusruh
Station from 1965 to 2004.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Auff'm Ordt, N.: Der Nachweis von Wellen in der Mesopause und deren
möglichen Quellen, Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Rostock, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Böhm, S., Pöschel, E., and Sommer, M.: Adlershofer Splitter 2, WITEGA
e.V., Berlin, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Breit, G. and Tuve, M. A.: A Radio Method of Estimating the Height of the
Conducting Layer, Nature, 116, 357 pp., 1925.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bremer, J., Gernandt, H., and Lucke, H.: Global Ionospheric Absorption
Measurements on Bord Ships, Gerlands Beitr. Geophysik, Leipzig, 89, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Fanselau, G.: Geomagnetische Feldwaagen, Z. Angew. Geol., 8, Heft 2, 62–64,
1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Gauss, C. F.: Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus, puplished in: Resultate
aus den Beobachtungen des Magnetischen Vereins im Jahre 1838, Weidmannsche
Verlagsbuchhandlung, Leipzig, 1839.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Gernandt, H.: Ionosphärische Anomalien in hohen geomagnetischen Breiten,
Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Rostock, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Gernandt, H.: Erlebnis Antarktis, Transpress VEB Verlag für
Verkehrswesen, 229–270, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Hauf, T., Finke, U., Neisser, J., Bull, G., and Stangenberg, J.-G.: A
Ground-Based Network for Atmospheric Pressure Fluctuations, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 13, 1001–1023, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, W., Webster, A. R., and Hocking, W. K.: An improved interferometer
design for use with meteor radars, Radio Sci., 33, 55–65, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Lange, H. and Tietze, H.: Wetterfrösche für Kurzwellen,
Militärverlag, Berlin, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Neisser, J.: Experimental Investigations of Atmospheric Gravity Waves,
Reports on polar and marine research, 588, 73–79, Alfred Wegner Institute,
Beremerhaven, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Neisser, J., Bull, G., Evers, K. Weimann, M., Weiß, E., Keder, J., and
Petenko, I. V.: Results of SODAR Investigantion of the Planetary Boundary
Layer, Proc. Field Exper. KOPEX-86, Institute of Physics of the Atmosphere of
Czech. Acad. Sc., Prague, 109–141, 1988.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Piggott, W. R. and Rawer, K.: URSI Handbook of Ionogram Interpretation and
Reduction, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, U.: Differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS), Chem. Anal.
Series, 127, 27–83, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Rawer, K.: Die Ionosphäre, Groningen, Noordhoff, 189 pp., 1953.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Rawer, K. and Suchy, K.: Radio Observations of the Ionosphere, in: Handbuch
der Physik, V.49/2, Springer, Berlin, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Reinisch, B. W., Haines, D. M., and Kuklinski, W. S.: The New Portable
Digisonde for Vertical and Oblique Sounding, AGARD-CP-502, February 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Reinisch, B. W., Galkin, I. A., Khmyrov, A. V., Kozlov, A. V., Bibl, K.,
Lisysyan, I. A., Cheney, G. P., Huang, X., Kitrosser, D. F., Paznukhov, V.
V., Luo, Y., Stelmasch, S., Hamel, R., and Grochmal, R.: New Digisonde for
research and minitoring applications, Radio Sci., 44, RS0A24,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008RS004115" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008RS004115</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Schlegel, K. and Lühr, H.: Willy Stoffregen – An early pioneer of
advanced ionospheric and auroral research, Hist. Geo Space. Sci., 5,
149–154, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hgss-5-149-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hgss-5-149-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Singer, W., Bremer, J., Weiß, J., Hocking, W. K., Höffner, J.,
Donner, M., and Espy, P.: Meteor radar observations at middle and Arctic
latitudes, Part 1: mean temperatures, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 66,
607–616, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2004.01.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2004.01.012</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Stangenberg, J.-G.: Anordnung zur Messung geringer atmosphärischer
Druckvariationen, DDR Wirtschaftspatent, DD GO1L/236170C, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Traxler, F. and Schlegel, K.: Hans Mögel, Transradio, and the Mögel
Dellinger Effect, Radio Science Bulletin, 351, 53–57, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Taubenheim, J.: The influence of solar flares on the ionospheric E layer, J.
Atmos. Terr. Phys., 11, 14–22, 1957.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Taubenheim, J. and Fürstenberg, F.: Das Heinrich-Hertz-Institut im
Internationalen Geophysikalischen Jahr, Wiss. u. Fortschr., 8, 145–149,
1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
von Cossart, G., Hoffmann, P., von Zahn, U., Keckhut, P., and Hauchecorne,
A.: Mid-latitude noctilucent cloud observations by lidar, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 23, 2919–2922, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96GL02768" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/96GL02768</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Weiß, E.: Methode und Ergebnisse der ionosphärischen Impulslotung
mittels elektromagentischer Wellen auf 314.5 kHz und 185 kHz,
Inaugural-Dissertation, Universität Rostock, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Weiß, J.: Überwachung elektronischer Anlagen durch eine Feuer- und
Havarie-Meldeanlage, Wissenschaftlich-technische Beilage 8/1972 der
Zeitschrift “Unser Brandschutz”, Staatsverlag der DDR, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
