<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HGSS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>History of Geo- and Space Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HGSS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hist. Geo Space. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2190-5029</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hgss-12-11-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>The history of the Geophysical Service of Austria</article-title><alt-title>The history of the Geophysical Service of Austria</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The history of the Geophysical Service of Austria}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{W.~A.~Lenhardt}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Lenhardt</surname><given-names>Wolfgang A.</given-names></name>
          <email>wolfgang.lenhardt@zamg.ac.at</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9031-3753</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department
of Geophysics, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik (ZAMG), Vienna, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Wolfgang A. Lenhardt (wolfgang.lenhardt@zamg.ac.at)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>11</fpage><lpage>19</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Wolfgang A. Lenhardt</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021.html">This article is available from https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e74">A brief summary will be given of the historical development of
Geophysical Service of Austria, which comprises the national geomagnetic,
gravimetric and seismological services as well as the “Applied Geophysics
Section” located at the Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik
(ZAMG) in Vienna in Austria. The paper presents the achievements, changes
and challenges of the Department from its modest beginning in 1851 until
2020. Finally, a special emphasis is placed on the Conrad Observatory – one
of the most comprehensive geophysical research observatories in the world.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e86">In 2021, the Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik (Central
Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, ZAMG for short) celebrates its
170th anniversary. This recurrence justifies a brief overview of its history
(Toperczer, 1975; Hammerl, 2001; Hammerl et al., 2001) and achievements. The ZAMG's development
reflects the evolution of technology and the changing expectations of a
national public service, especially with the advent of computers. Today, the
ZAMG provides a large number of services beyond its core weather forecasting
and geophysical monitoring activities, which include comprehensive climate
observations, phenology, modelling of the Earth magnetic field and its
interactions with the Sun and the atmosphere, geophysical surveys, and
monitoring of earthquakes. These activities, along with the ZAMG archives
hosting the longest history of meteorological and geophysical observations
in Austria, provide key support for risk assessment and decision-making at a
national and international level. Today, the ZAMG belongs to the Federal Ministry for
Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and currently has 324 employees
including 187 scientists working in the headquarters and four external
offices as well as at two observatories – the “Sonnblick” (meteorology)
and the “Conrad” (geophysics). The Geophysical Service of Austria – being
part of the ZAMG – consists of 31 persons.</p>
      <p id="d1e89">Despite national services (Austrian Commission on Large Dams, the Austrian
Standards Institute for earthquake resistant building engineering), the
Austrian Geophysical Service maintains permanent contact with international
organizations such as the International Association for Geomagnetism of
Aeronomy (IAGA), INTERMAGNET, the International Association of Seismology and
Physics of the Earth's Interior (IASPEI), the Observatories and Research Facilities for
European Seismology (ORFEUS), the European-Mediterranean Seismological
Centre (EMSC), and the Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks (FDSN). In addition,
the department hosts the National Data Centre of Austria (NDC-AT) as
national point of contact of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
(CTBTO). In 2014, Italy (OGS), Slovenia (ARSO) and the ZAMG-Geophysics
founded the Central and Eastern Europe Earthquake Research Network
“CE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RN“ (e.g. Picozzi et al., 2014; Pesaresi et al.,
2017). This initiative not only allowed several institutions to organize
common projects, but also solidified co-operations across borders and
supports civil protection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Historical development</title>
      <p id="d1e109">On 13 May 1848 – in the midst of the revolution in the Austrian
Empire – Andreas Baron of Baumgarten of the Austrian Academy of Sciences,
which was founded just a year before in 1847, suggested to equip the newly
built railway stations with meteorological instruments to monitor the
weather across the Austro-Hungarian Empire.</p>
      <p id="d1e112">On 24 June 1848 Karl Kreil – then director of the Astronomical
Observatory in Prague – furnished a concept of a<?pagebreak page12?> future meteorological
network which included not only railway stations but also astronomical
observatories and clerical and scientific institutions. Kreil listed 22
tasks which covered phenological, biological, magnetic, electric,
earthquake, astronomical observations and air chemistry in his
concept. After another year of consultations and preparing a profound
proposal on the advice of his Minister for Science and Education Count Leopold
of Thun and Hohenstein, the “Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und
Erdmagnetismus” (Central Institute for Meteorology and Geomagnetism), as it
was named then, was founded by Emperor Franz Joseph I on 23 July 1851.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Geomagnetic surveys: 1851–1904</title>
      <p id="d1e122">Karl Kreil (1778–1862) served as the first director of the institute, which was
established at the Academy of Sciences in the centre of Vienna. Kreil had
already been acquainted with magnetic measurements since 1842 and his survey
campaigns between 1842 and 1857 culminated in the first geomagnetic map of
the Austrian Empire, southern Europe, the Adriatic Sea, Turkey and the Black
Sea for the Epoche 1850.0.  Geomagnetic maps were of immense scientific and
military value. Owing to the varying nature of the geomagnetic field due to
secular variations, the surveys were now repeated every few decades to
maintain state-of-the-art information on the Earth's magnetic field.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e127">First quarters of the institution 1852 (ZAMG, 1856).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e136">In 1852 new offices in Favoritenstraße 303 (in today's 4th district
of Vienna) housed staff members and instruments for weather and geomagnetic
monitoring (Fig. 1). Seismometers were not
available at that time, which prompted Kreil to publish a paper on a
seismograph (Kreil, 1855), which consisted of a permanent recording system
in combination with a device – similar to Zhang Heng's famous seismoscope
from 132 AD in China (e.g. Dewey and Byerly, 1969) – indicating the direction
and “strength” of an incoming earthquake ground motion. Kreil seems to
have designed this instrument between 1848 and 1850, with parts apparently
still preserved at the National Technical Museum in Prague (Oldroyd et al.,
2007). Whether this instrument was ever completed or not remains very
uncertain, as no seismograms survived or were referred to. Kreil then
summarized the magnetic observations he made during this first geomagnetic
survey, which was published posthumously (Kreil, 1862). The second large
geomagnetic survey took place in 1890.</p>
      <p id="d1e140">In 1872 the institute moved to a new building, which was specially built
for that purpose by the Viennese architect Heinrich Ferstel at the Hohe
Warte (today's 19th district in Vienna, Fig. 2) where the institute still maintains it Headquarters.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e145">Home of ZAMG since 1872 at the Hohe Warte in Vienna (ZAMG
archive).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e154">In the late hours of Easter Sunday in 1895 a strong earthquake hit Ljubljana
(at that time part of the Imperial and Royal Austrian Empire, now Slovenia;
Fig. 3), which initiated intensive investigations
as to whether and where the Austrian Empire was already vulnerable to similar
or even worse earthquakes with more dramatic consequences.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e159">Earthquake damage in Ljubljana 1895 (TSN, 2020).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e168">It was this earthquake which led to the establishment of the Slovenian
Seismological Service (known in those days as “Erdbebenwarte in Laibach”).
Personnel limitations by the Academy of Sciences led to the addition of
seismological observations to the agenda of the purposely renamed
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik with effect of
2 March 1904. Observations of earthquake effects had already been
reported by 14 earthquake “correspondents” since 1895, who gathered the
reports from hundreds of observers. The correspondents regularly published
the results in<?pagebreak page13?> journals of the Imperial and Royal Austrian Academy of
Sciences (Hammerl, 2001). At this time earthquake-related observations were
added to the routine meteorological and geomagnetic agenda of the ZAMG.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>The advent of seismology: 1904–1939</title>
      <p id="d1e179">The newly established Seismological Service of Austria
(“Österreichischer Erdbebendienst”) benefitted from earlier studies by
prominent scientists like Eduard Suess (1873; see also Brückl and
Hammerl, 2014) who already described the seismicity of Lower Austria (the
province surrounding the capital Vienna). By that time, Rudolf Hoernes (1878) had already categorized seismic events into “earthquakes”,
“volcanic tremors” and “collapse events”, the latter being frequently
observed in the Karst region in Slovenia.</p>
      <p id="d1e182">The most famous seismologist of the ZAMG was certainly Victor Conrad
(1876–1962, Fig. 4), who also analysed
meteorological time series and worked as a climatologist. He headed the
Seismological Service from 1904 to 1910, when he left to take assume a
newly created chair on “Cosmic Physics” at the Chernivtsi National University in Bukovina – today Ukraine. He returned in 1919 to lead the Department
again until 1934 when Conrad was succeeded by Rudolf Schneider. The advent of
the Nazi regime in 1938 prompted Victor Conrad, who was of Jewish
descent, to leave Austria and to emigrate to the USA, where he lectured
climatology again at several universities – eventually at Harvard University in
Cambridge, Massachusetts – until 1951.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e187">Victor Conrad (1876–1962) (ZAMG archive).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e197">Given the mean financial situation of the ministry, Conrad was advised to
develop a cost-effective seismic instrument (Conrad, 1910). The
“Conrad pendulum” was much smaller (with a suspended mass of 25 kg) than
the Wiechert seismograph (Wiechert, 1904) and easy to transport and to install.
It proved to be very sturdy – and recorded many stronger ground motions, when
the Wiechert seismograph “clipped”. As the pendulum was much less
sensitive (by a factor of at least 10), it was hardly of any use for
recording distant earthquakes. Despite these shortcomings, these instruments
were then distributed across the monarchy, enabling seismologists to analyse
all kinds of seismological aspects such as temporal earthquake
distributions for example (Conrad, 1932) as they proved to be very valuable regionally.
Conrad became most famous for his exchange of observations and ideas with
Harold Jeffreys (see also Conrad, 1925; Jeffreys, 1927) suggesting a
discontinuity, separating the upper from the lower Earth's crust, which
later became known as the Conrad discontinuity.</p>
      <p id="d1e200">Meanwhile, the seismic observatory in the basement of the ZAMG main building
at the Hohe Warte hosted several seismometers: three Vicentini pendulums
(two horizontal and one vertical; see Vicentini and Pacher, 1896, 1898)
and an Wiechert inverted pendulum (1000 kg) for recording the two
horizontal components, as well as a Wiechert seismograph for vertical recordings
(mass 1300 kg) (Conrad, 1909).</p>
      <p id="d1e203">As the Austro-Hungarian monarchy dissolved in 1918, the Republic of
Austria was formally established in 1919, and<?pagebreak page14?> most parts of the previous
empire became independent in 1919, thus falling under the influence of
Russia, whereas South Tyrol belonged now to Italy. Owing to the new
political situation, the third geomagnetic survey in 1930 was carried out in Austria on a much smaller scale. For that purpose a geomagnetic
base observatory was erected at Auhof on the outskirts of Vienna, which was
in operation from 1928 to 1945.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>World War II: 1939–1945</title>
      <p id="d1e215">Just a little more than two weeks after the Second World War had begun,
the Puchberg earthquake occurred south of Vienna on 18 September 1939. News about this earthquake, which claimed two lives, were largely
obscured by the much larger human loss of the Battle of the Bzura (west of Warsaw
in Poland), which marked the German advance in Poland. From now on, the
collection of macroseismic reports became severely hampered – and even more
impeded by the massive reductions in personnel when all young staff members were drafted by the military.</p>
      <p id="d1e218">Air raids on 9 November 1944 (Allied Forces) and German artillery attacks on
20 February 1945 almost destroyed the ZAMG at the Hohe Warte, causing
extensive damage to the seismographs in the basement (Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e223">Damaged main building in 1944 (ZAMG archive).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e233">In April 1945, just before the end of the war, the magnetic observatory at
Auhof in the south-east of Vienna was completely destroyed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>The postwar years: 1945–1955</title>
      <p id="d1e244">The transitional years between World War II and Austria's independence were
characterized by the recovery of destroyed instruments and archives. The
pendulums of Vicentini were irreparably lost, and the vertical Wiechert
seismograph and the Conrad pendulum were repaired and put into
service again on 15 September 1948. The repair of the
“horizontal Wiechert” took much longer – until 23 June 1950
(Toperczer, 1975). Based on documentation and recordings from 1904 to
1948 the first earthquake catalogue was published (Toperczer and Trapp,
1950). At this time, the list of earthquakes was not scrutinized in any way
but accepted as it was.</p>
      <p id="d1e247">The repairs of the geomagnetic observatory at Auhof took much longer than
expected, and magnetic observations resumed on 18 September 1951 for
less than a year until its definitive dismissal on 14 July 1952, due
to the magnetic disturbances associated with the increasing city
electrification (Toperczer, 1975). A new site for these geomagnetic
observations was needed to warrant conclusive measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Entering modern times: 1955–1990</title>
      <p id="d1e258">As the ZAMG headquarters at the Hohe Warte were also affected by the city's
progressing electrification, a new location for the magnetic observatory was
found at a former riding camp of the US Army at the Cobenzl in the Vienna
Woods (Fig. 6), not far from the ZAMG Headquarters. The new Cobenzl geomagnetic
observatory (mostly spelled “Kobenzl” in publications; see Toperczer,
1956) continuously operated from 1954 to 2016. It was eventually equipped
with seismometers and officially inaugurated during the General Assembly of
the European Seismological Commission (ESC) in Vienna in 1956. Therefore,
the Cobenzl observatory can be regarded as the first true “geophysical
observatory” in Austria (with the exemption of gravimetric observations).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e263">Main part of the former geomagnetic observatory at the Cobenzl in Vienna, which was in operation from 1954–2016 (ZAMG archive).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e272">Successive geomagnetic surveys took place in 1960 and 1970 and served as
references for the first aeromagnetic survey by the Geological Survey of
Austria in 1977 (Gutdeutsch and Seiberl, 1987). Already at that time,
increasing magnetic disturbances from the expanding electrified city
transportation system became evident again. The continued worsening of the
magnetic record quality initiated the first plans to relocate the magnetic
observatory far from Vienna, but close enough to enable continuous
maintenance.</p>
      <p id="d1e276">Given the vast amount of data stemming either from macroseismic reports,
local seismograms or international seismological centres, the Seismological
Service of Austria<?pagebreak page15?> was able to publish summaries of the earthquake activity
in Austria (Drimmel et al., 1970; Drimmel and Trapp, 1982) while making use
of these data to estimate possible maximum intensities for the territory
(Drimmel, 1979). The latter was important for assessing the seismic hazard
of planned industrial projects such as large dams, nuclear power plants and
infrastructure in general. The series of earthquakes in Friuli (Italy) in
1976 drew attention to the proper earthquake-resistant design of private dwellings, as
many of them suffered damage in Southern Carinthia. As a consequence, the
Austrian building code for earthquake-resistant design was updated and a new
version was published in 1979 (ÖNORM, 1979).</p>
      <p id="d1e279">As the lack of knowledge of the local earthquake activity in Austria became
a matter of dispute between geoscientists during the final planning phase of
the nuclear power plant in Zwentendorf near Vienna, historical earthquake
research (Gutdeutsch et al., 1987) was initiated. Shortly thereafter,
several seismic stations were installed across Austria by the University of
Vienna, which supported the study of the Earth's crust in the Eastern Alps
(Aric et al., 1989). This co-operation with the University of Vienna had a
long standing, as professors from the university were routinely entrusted
with the directorship of the ZAMG, and ZAMG scientists lectured at the
university.</p>
      <p id="d1e282">After more than 70 years of service both Wiechert seismographs were taken
out of operation on 10 March 1977. The Conrad pendulum was in use
until 4 May 1981, and a vertical short-period seismometer (Sprengnether
S-5007; see also Moore et al., 2018) was used from 1 January 1973
to 31 December 2006 in the basement of a new building at the
Hohe Warte.</p>
      <p id="d1e285">At this point, more emphasis was given to seismic instruments and records
from the Cobenzl, which were recording in parallel, as the seismic background at
the Hohe Warte at the time exceeded acceptable limits. Two horizontal short-period
seismometers (also of the Sprengnether type) were in operation from 1 January 1973 to 16 September 1981 and replaced with
“very broadband feedback” seismometers (Streckeisen STS-1; Holcomb and Hutt,
1992) on 25 March 1983, which were used until 19 August 2002.
The longest period of continuous seismic records was made at the Cobenzl
with a short-period seismometer from 20 January 1982 to 31 December 2006.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>The digital age: 1990–2020</title>
      <p id="d1e296">The first digital seismic station went into operation on 31 May 1989
at the Walderalm in Tyrol. This station marked the beginning of a local network
which was then expanded to four stations in 1991. Since then, the seismic
network has seen numerous additions of digital stations (see also Lenhardt
et al., 2001). The first sensors in use were short-period seismometers which
were later replaced with broadband sensors. Strong-motion stations
supplemented the network in built-up areas for comparing recorded ground
motions with earthquake-related building damage. Since 2002 all
instruments now undergo rigid tests at the Conrad Observatory near Vienna.</p>
      <p id="d1e299">In 1995 a proposal for an update of the seismic hazard map of Austria was
put forward (Lenhardt, 1995) and implemented by the Austrian Institute of
Codes (ÖNORM, 1997). At this time, it became custom to review earthquake
catalogues by historians. Hence, historical earthquake research was added to
the department's agenda leading to important improvements in the earthquake
catalogue of Austria. This was the first time historical earthquake
information from Austria was scrutinized and interpreted professionally. The
increasing amount of data gave rise to a number of publications concerning
the general seismicity of Austria (Hammerl and Lenhardt, 1997) and
historical earthquakes (e.g. Hammerl and Lenhardt, 2013). During these
investigations some earthquakes were found to be “fake quakes” and
numerous earthquakes were discovered in so-far unknown sources. The reason
for these fake quakes in the earthquake catalogue was unscrutinized copying
of older catalogues which misprinted dates or years or misunderstood and
associated other natural catastrophes such as floods from elsewhere with
earthquakes in Austria (Hammerl and Lenhardt, 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e302">The information of regional historical seismic activity and the resulting
seismic hazard map also allowed areas where stronger
earthquakes tend to happen to be delineated. This proved to be useful when an earthquake in
Bovec (Slovenia) in 1998 happened, which also affected Austrian territory.
As a consequence, a 24/7 service for the Austrian warning centres was
officially established on 1 April 2000. The same year also marked the transition from paper to online questionnaires
published on the ZAMG website to gather near-real-time public responses from
earthquakes. This<?pagebreak page16?> service permits the ZAMG to disseminate relevant
information to regional disaster protection centres to foster action. As of
2020, the seismic network consists of 28 broadband stations (some
of which are also equipped with strong-motion sensors, and more than 30 strong motion stations, of which 6 are installed in Vienna alone (Duma,
1996, when the network became installed).</p>
      <p id="d1e305">Peter Melichar (Head of Department 1991–2009) founded the new division of
“Applied Geophysics” in 1991 to take care of archaeological prospection by
means of geophysical methods – an area of research and development at the
already ZAMG since 1982. Meanwhile, the Applied Geophysics group is also
dealing with dam investigations and mine safety and with the development of
new tools for automatic pre-processing of field data (e.g. Aßmann et
al., 2001;  Neubauer et al., 2001, 2013; Seren et al., 2001a, b). The
division of “Applied Geophysics” also collaborates closely with the Ludwig
Boltzmann Institute for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology
in Austria since its foundation in 2010, and many astounding findings can be
attributed to this initiative (e.g. Seren et al., 2011; Neubauer et al.,
2012; Sakal et al., 2014; Sevara et al., 2020), not to mention the recent
survey of the Durrington Walls near Stonehenge, which provided new insights
into the celtic culture in England (ZAMG, 2020) and the cultural extent of
Stonehenge.</p>
      <p id="d1e309">In 1996, a superconducting gravimeter by GWR Instruments<sup>®</sup>
(Meurers et al., 2001) was installed in the basement of the
Kreil building at the ZAMG headquarters in Vienna. It was at this time that
Peter Melichar coined the name “Geophysical Service of Austria” as the
department constituted the only governmental institution in Austria to cover
all geophysical disciplines on a national level: seismology,
geomagnetics, gravimetry and applied geophysics.</p>
      <p id="d1e315">In addition, geomagnetic research at the ZAMG has expanded considerably
during the last years, aided by the seventh geomagnetic survey between
1995 and 1998 (Berger at al., 2001), and now includes many interdisciplinary
subjects related to the reconstruction of past geomagnetic variations, the
interaction of the Earth magnetic field with living organisms and with the
atmosphere, and the occurrence of magnetic minerals in rocks and sediments
as markers for tectonic and environmental processes. Such research is mainly
carried out at the Conrad Observatory.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>The Conrad Observatory</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Overview</title>
      <p id="d1e334">Based on a decree by Victor Conrad's wife Ida Conrad, and financial support
from the Austrian Government, the geophysical observatory at the Trafelberg
south-west of Vienna, just a 1.5 h drive from the ZAMG, could
be constructed. The site was selected by Peter Melichar (then Head of
Department), who also took care of the planning and design as well as the
whole technical set-up. Due to the remoteness of the selected site, the
observatory had to be equipped with all necessary infrastructure from
scratch, as there was no water supply, no electricity, and no telephone or
internet. The observatory consists of two parts: the Seismological and
Gravity Observatory (SGO) and the Geomagnetic Observatory (GMO).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>The Seismological-Gravitational Observatory (SGO)</title>
      <p id="d1e345">The SGO (Fig. 7, weather station in the
foreground, satellite dishes in the background to connect to the
International Data Centre of the CTBTO) was inaugurated on 23 May 2002. The building operations lasted from 13 July 1998 to 19 October 2000 to advance a 145 m long tunnel for seismic instrumentation into
the Trafelberg mountain and to establish a laboratory for gravity
measurements, a calibration table for seismometers and to sink four boreholes
(one with a depth of 50 m for testing geophone chains and three boreholes
down to 100 m for research purposes). Gravity measurements are carried out
in co-operation with the Austrian Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying
(BEV) for which the observatory also serves as a basic measuring point.</p>
      <p id="d1e348">It took another 12 years to develop the Geomagnetic Observatory, which was
the original reason for the remote site selection.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e353">The Conrad Observatory – SGO (ZAMG, 2014).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>The Geomagnetic Observatory (GMO)</title>
      <p id="d1e370">The GMO was officially inaugurated on 21 May 2014. It consists of an
underground infrastructure with a total tunnel length of 1 km, and a rock
laboratory to analyse magnetic properties of rock samples equipped with most
modern magnetometers and a thermal demagnetizer.</p>
      <p id="d1e373">The main objective of the observatory, however, is monitoring the Earth's magnetic
field under optimized conditions (e.g. temperature, noise). The
geomagnetic variation measurement system also takes into account thermal
conditions. The entire measuring system consists of various instruments.
The sheer amount of different devices ensures the most<?pagebreak page17?> accurate measurements in
permitting the detection and elimination of undesired “noise”, thus
enabling the determination of time-varying gradients of the geomagnetic
field in all directions with utmost precision. Readings are taken
automatically and manually checked on a regular basis
(Fig. 8).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e378">Manual control of automatic measurements of the geomagnetic field
taken at the Conrad Observatory – GMO (ZAMG, 2014).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/11/2021/hgss-12-11-2021-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e388">Additional geomagnetic observing points are operating in an underground mine
in Tyrol in the western part of Austria, which went into operation on
20 July 2017, and in Gams (Styria), which is maintained and operated by
the University of Leoben. The measurements from Tyrol are transmitted in
real time to the data centre at the ZAMG and are continuously compared with
observations from the Conrad Observatory – thus covering the longitudinal
range of Austria to a large extent in the E–W direction, which coincides with
the main movement of the secular variation of the geomagnetic field in that
region.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Looking ahead</title>
      <p id="d1e400">As all geophysical disciplines are being covered by the Geophysical
Service Survey of Austria, specific research tasks have attracted special
attention. Obviously, the more seismic stations are installed in Austria,
the greater the ability to distinguish natural earthquakes from induced ones. The number of seismic stations of the national network are planned
to be increased even further thus permitting the cause of a seismic tremor to be monitored more closely, whatever it might have been (exploitation,
explosions, water reservoirs, rock falls – or natural earthquakes).
Currently more than 50 % of detected seismic events can already be
attributed to man-made activities in Austria.</p>
      <p id="d1e403">As the Conrad Observatory includes several tunnels of hundreds of metres in length,
strain measurements appear to be very informative when compared with seismic
observations in terms of seismic wave lengths and their resolution and accuracy. This principle
applies also to gravimetric and magnetic measurements, which can be analysed
there. In addition, space-weather forecasts became an issue when society
began to rely on data transmission (internet) and magnetic storage systems. Such an
early-warning system was introduced by the Geophysical Service in 2020 to
assist the Austrian Power Grid.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e411">No data sets were used in this article.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e417">The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e423">This article is part of the special issue “History of geophysical institutes and observatories”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e429">The author would like to express his thanks to Barbara Leichter, Ramon Egli and Roman Leonhardt for providing technical details.
Photographs used in the paper were obtained from the historical archive of
the Department of Geophysics at the Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und
Geodynamik (ZAMG). Lois Lammerhuber took the photographs in Figs. 6 and 7
on behalf of the ZAMG. This article benefitted from comments and suggestions
from two anonymous reviewers and the editor, whose assistance is gratefully
acknowledged.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e434">This paper was edited by Kristian Schlegel and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Aric, K., Gutdeutsch, R., Leichter, B., Lenhardt, W. A., Plomerova, J.,
Babuska, V., Padjusak, P., and Nixdorf, U.: Structure of the lithosphere in
the Eastern Alps derived from P-residual analysis. Arbeiten aus der
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Publ. Nr. 317, Vienna,
Austria, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Aßmann, K., Dörrer, T., Lehmann, B., Lux, K., Seren, S., and Schön,
J.: Geophysical investigations at different parts of the planned Koralm
Tunnel, J. Eng. Geol., 6, 22–30, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Berger, J., Blaumoser, N., Duma, G., and Leichter, B.: The geomagnetic survey
of Austria 1995–1998, Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy,  31,
279–284, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brückl, E. and Hammerl, C.: Eduard Suess' conception of the Alpine
orogeny related to geophysical data and models, Austrian J. Earth
Sc.,   107, 94–114, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V.: Beschreibung des seismischen Observatoriums der k.k.,
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik in Wien, Mitteilungen der
Erdbeben-Kommission, Neue Folge Nr. 33, Österr. Akad. d. Wissenschaften,
Vienna, Austria, 1909.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page18?><ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V.: Ein einfaches Instrument für seismische Stationen in
habituellen Stossgebieten, Beiträge zur Geophysik, Bd. X, Heft 3,
157–160, 1910.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V.: Laufzeitkurven des Tauernbebens vom 28. November 1923,
Mitteilungen der Erdbeben-Kommission, Neue Folge Nr. 59, Österr. Akad.
d. Wissenschaften, Vienna, Austria, 1925.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V.: Die zeitliche Folge der Erdbeben und bebenauslösende
Ursachen. Handbuch der Geophysik (edited by B. Gutenberg), Band IV,
Gebrüder Bornträger, Berlin, 1007–1190, 1932.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dewey, J. and Byerly, P.: The early history of Seismometry (to 1900), Bull.
Seism. Soc. Am.,  59, 189–227, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Drimmel, J.: On the assessment of maximum earthquakes in the Alps and
adjacent areas, Tectonophysics, 55, 1–5, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Drimmel, J. and Trapp, E.: Die Erdbeben Österreichs 1971–1980,
Sitzungsber. der Österr. Akad. d. Wiss., Mathem.-naturw. Kl. Ant. I,
191. Band, 1.–4. Heft, Vienna, 73–102, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Drimmel, J., Gangl, G., and Trapp E.: Kartenmäßige Darstellung der
Seismizität Österreichs. Österr. Akad. Wiss., Springer-Verlag,
Vienna, 1971, 23 pp., 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Duma, G., Horn, N., and Vogelmann, A.: Seismisches Strong-Motion Meßnetz in Wien. Projekt-Endbericht im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wissenschaft and Forschung und der Stadt Wien, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, 38 pp., Vienna, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gutdeutsch, R. and Seiberl, W.: Die aeromagnetische Vermessung
Österreichs – Endbericht, Inst. Meteor. Geoph. Univ. Wien, 8
Figs., 1 Table, 1 Map, Wien, 34 pp., 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gutdeutsch, R., Hammerl, C., Mayer, I., and Vocelka, K.: Erdbeben als
historisches Ereignis, Die Rekonstruktion des Bebens von 1590 in
Niederösterreich, Springer Verlag, Vienna, Austria, 221 pp., 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hammerl, C.: Die Geschichte der Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und
Geodynamik, in: Hammerl et al., 2001, 17–297, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hammerl, C. and Lenhardt, W.: Erdbeben in Österreich, Leykam Verlag,
Graz, 191 pp., 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hammerl, C. and Lenhardt, W.: Erdbeben in Niederösterreich von 1000 bis
2009 n. Chr. Abh. Geol. B.-A., Vienna, Vol. 67,  297 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hammerl, C., Lenhardt, W., Steinacker, R., and Steinhauser, P. (Eds.):
Meteorologie und Geophysik in Österreich, A comprehensive compilation of
the institutional history on the occasion of the 150-year jubilee of the
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Wien, Leykam Verlag, 838
pp., 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoernes, R.: Erdbebenstudien. Jahrbuch der k.k. geologischen <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Reichsanstalt<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>, Vol. 28/3, 387–448, Vienna, 1878.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Holcomb, G. and Hutt, R.: Three Installations methods for the STS-1 were
tested at the Albuquerque Seismological Lab (ALS), USGS Open File Report
USA, 92–302, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jeffreys, H.: On two british earthquakes, Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society, Geophysical Supplement, 1, 483–494, 1927.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kreil, K.: Über einen neuen Erdbebenmesser. Sitzungsberichte der
math.-naturw, Classe der kais, Akademie der Wissenschaften, XV. Bd., p.
370, Vienna, 1855.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kreil, K.: Magnetische und geographische Ortsbestimmungen im
südöstlichen Europa und einigen Küstenpunkten Asiens,
Sitzungsberichte der math.-naturw. Classe am 24. Juni 1859, Denkschriften, Bd. XX, 1862.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lenhardt, W.: Regional earthquake hazard in Austria, Proc. of “10th European
Conference on Earthquake Engineering”, edited by: Duma, G., Balkema, 63–68, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lenhardt, W., Melichar, P., Steiner, R., and Horn, N.: Erdbebenstationen in
Österreich, in: Hammerl et al., 2001, 567–576, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Meurers, B., Blaumoser, N., Göschke, M., Haden S., Melichar, P., and
Steiner R.: Das Supraleitende Gravimeter in Wien – ein Beitrag zur modernen
geodynamischen Forschung, in: Hammerl et al., 2001, 608–618, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moore, S. V., Hutt, C. R., Anthony, R. E., Ringler, A. T., Alejandro, A. C. B., and
Wilson, D. C.: A Collection of Historic Seismic Instrumentation Photographs
at the Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory, Seismol. Res. Lett.,
90,   765–773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/0220180267</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Neubauer, W.: Geophysikalisch-archäologische Prospektion an der ZAMG, in:
Hammerl et al.,  2001, 726–743, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Neubauer, W. and Seren, S.: Die Entdeckung der Gladiatorenschule in
Carnuntum, Acta Carnuntina, 2, 4–13, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Neubauer, W., Doneus, M., Trinks, I., Verhoven, G., Hinterleitner, A.,
Seren, S., and Löcker, K.: Long-term integrated archaeological
prospection at the Roman town of Carnuntum/Austria – Archaeological Survey
and the City. Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK, 202–221, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Oldroyd, D., Amador, F., Kozak, J., Carneiro, A., and Pinto, M.: The study of
earthquakes in the hundred years following the Lisbon earthquake of 1755,
Earth Sciences History,  History of the Earth Sciences
Society, 26, 321–370, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
ÖNORM: Belastungsannahmen im Bauwesen, Erdbebenkräfte an nicht
schwingungsanfälligen Bauwerken – ÖNORM B 4015, Austrian Standards
Institute (ON), DK 624.042.7:550.34  (436), 10 pp., 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
ÖNORM: Belastungsannahmen im Bauwesen, Außergewöhnliche
Einwirkungen, Erdbebeneinwirkungen, Grundlagen – ÖNORM B 4015-1,
Austrian Standards Institute (ON), ICS 91.010.30, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pesaresi, D., Picozzi, M., Živčić, M., Lenhardt, W.,
Mucciarelli, M., Elia, L., Zollo, A., and Gosar, A.: A cross-border regional
earthquake early warning system: PRESTo@CE3RN, Nat. Hazards, 86, 431–440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2695-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-016-2695-0</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Picozzi, M., Elia, L., Pesaresi, D., Zollo, A., Mucciarelli, M., Gosar, A.,
Lenhardt, W., and Zivcic, M.: Trans-National Earthquake Early Warning (EEW)
in North-Eastern Italy, Slovenia and Austria: First Experience with PRESTo
at the CE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>RN Network, EGU2014 SM1.2/GI3.7 session, 19
pp., 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sakal, F., Müller, D., Hinterleitner, A., Löcker, K., and Seren, S.:
Jebel el-Hamam, Final report about the Syrian-German Survey, Zeitschrift
für Orient-Archäologie, Band 7, ISBN
978-3-8030-0221-1, 158–196, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seren, S., Blaumoser, N., and Melichar, P.: Erfassung von Altlasten, in:
Hammerl et al., 2001, 717–725, 2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seren, S., Eder-Hinterleitner, A., and Melichar, P.: 3D-Erkundung mittels
Georadar und Seismik im Felshohlraumbau, in:   Hammerl et al., 2001, 707–716,
2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seren, S., Löcker, K., Hinterleitner, A., and Ladstätter, S.: Ephesos
revisited: A decade of geophysical prospection on different field conditions
in Ephesos, Turkey, 9. International Conference on Archaeological
Prospection in Izmir/Türkei, Proceedings, 90–92, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page19?><ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sevara, C., Salisbury, R., Totschnig, R., Doneus, M., Löcker, K., and
Tusa, S.: New discoveries at Mokarta, a Bronze Age hilltop settlement in
western Sicily, Antiquity, 94, 686–704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.15184/aqy.2019.171</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Suess, E.: Die Erdbeben Nieder-Österreichs, Denkschrift Kgl. Akad.
Wissenschaft, Wien, Mat. Naturw., Klasse 33, 61–98, 1873.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Toperczer, M.: Das geophysikalische Observatorium Wien-Kobenzl. Arch. f.
Met., Geoph. und Bioklimatologie, Serie: Meteorologie und Geophysik, Band
9, 3. Heft, 1956.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Toperczer, M.: Die Geschichte der Geophysik an der Zentralanstalt für
Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Arb. aus der Zentralanst. f. Met. und Geodyn.,
Publ. Nr. 208, 24 pp., 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Toperczer, M. and Trapp, E.: Ein Beitrag zur Erdbebengeographie
Österreichs nebst Erdbebenkatalog 1904–1948 und Chronik der Starkbeben.
Mitteilungen der Erdbeben-Kommission, Neue Folge Nr. 65, Österr. Akad.
d. Wissenschaften, Vienna, Austria, 59 pp., 1950.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>TSN: Total Slovenia News,  available at: <uri>https://www.total-slovenia-news.com/lifestyle/1046-old-photos-ljubljana-after-the-earthquake</uri>, last access: 17 February 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vicentini, G. and Pacher, G.: Considerazioni sugli apparecchi sismici
registratori e modificazione del microsismografo a due componenti, Boll.
Soc. sism. ital. II, 107–121, 1896.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vicentini, G. and Pacher, G.: Microsismografo per la componente verticale,
Atti Ist. veneto Sci. Ser., 7, 65–89, 1898.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wiechert, E.: Ein astatisches Pendel hoher Empfindlichkeit zur mechanischen
Registrierung von Erdbeben, Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik, Bd. VI,
435–450, 1904.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
ZAMG: “Jahrbuch 1856”, Annual report of ZAMG, Library of the ZAMG, Vienna, 1856.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
ZAMG: Photo by Lammerhuber on behalf of ZAMG, Archive of ZAMG,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ZAMG: Stonehenge,
<uri>https://www.zamg.ac.at/cms/de/geophysik/news/neue-entdeckung-bei-stonehenge-mit-oesterreichischer-beteiligung</uri>,
last access: 1 December 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The history of the Geophysical Service of Austria</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>A brief summary will be given of the historical development of
Geophysical Service of Austria, which comprises the national geomagnetic,
gravimetric and seismological services as well as the <q>Applied Geophysics
Section</q> located at the Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik
(ZAMG) in Vienna in Austria. The paper presents the achievements, changes
and challenges of the Department from its modest beginning in 1851 until
2020. Finally, a special emphasis is placed on the Conrad Observatory – one
of the most comprehensive geophysical research observatories in the world.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aric, K., Gutdeutsch, R., Leichter, B., Lenhardt, W. A., Plomerova, J.,
Babuska, V., Padjusak, P., and Nixdorf, U.: Structure of the lithosphere in
the Eastern Alps derived from P-residual analysis. Arbeiten aus der
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Publ. Nr. 317, Vienna,
Austria, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aßmann, K., Dörrer, T., Lehmann, B., Lux, K., Seren, S., and Schön,
J.: Geophysical investigations at different parts of the planned Koralm
Tunnel, J. Eng. Geol., 6, 22–30, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Berger, J., Blaumoser, N., Duma, G., and Leichter, B.: The geomagnetic survey
of Austria 1995–1998, Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy,  31,
279–284, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Brückl, E. and Hammerl, C.: Eduard Suess' conception of the Alpine
orogeny related to geophysical data and models, Austrian J. Earth
Sc.,   107, 94–114, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V.: Beschreibung des seismischen Observatoriums der k.k.,
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik in Wien, Mitteilungen der
Erdbeben-Kommission, Neue Folge Nr. 33, Österr. Akad. d. Wissenschaften,
Vienna, Austria, 1909.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V.: Ein einfaches Instrument für seismische Stationen in
habituellen Stossgebieten, Beiträge zur Geophysik, Bd. X, Heft 3,
157–160, 1910.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V.: Laufzeitkurven des Tauernbebens vom 28. November 1923,
Mitteilungen der Erdbeben-Kommission, Neue Folge Nr. 59, Österr. Akad.
d. Wissenschaften, Vienna, Austria, 1925.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Conrad, V.: Die zeitliche Folge der Erdbeben und bebenauslösende
Ursachen. Handbuch der Geophysik (edited by B. Gutenberg), Band IV,
Gebrüder Bornträger, Berlin, 1007–1190, 1932.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dewey, J. and Byerly, P.: The early history of Seismometry (to 1900), Bull.
Seism. Soc. Am.,  59, 189–227, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Drimmel, J.: On the assessment of maximum earthquakes in the Alps and
adjacent areas, Tectonophysics, 55, 1–5, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Drimmel, J. and Trapp, E.: Die Erdbeben Österreichs 1971–1980,
Sitzungsber. der Österr. Akad. d. Wiss., Mathem.-naturw. Kl. Ant. I,
191. Band, 1.–4. Heft, Vienna, 73–102, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Drimmel, J., Gangl, G., and Trapp E.: Kartenmäßige Darstellung der
Seismizität Österreichs. Österr. Akad. Wiss., Springer-Verlag,
Vienna, 1971, 23 pp., 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Duma, G., Horn, N., and Vogelmann, A.: Seismisches Strong-Motion Meßnetz in Wien. Projekt-Endbericht im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wissenschaft and Forschung und der Stadt Wien, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, 38 pp., Vienna, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gutdeutsch, R. and Seiberl, W.: Die aeromagnetische Vermessung
Österreichs – Endbericht, Inst. Meteor. Geoph. Univ. Wien, 8
Figs., 1 Table, 1 Map, Wien, 34 pp., 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gutdeutsch, R., Hammerl, C., Mayer, I., and Vocelka, K.: Erdbeben als
historisches Ereignis, Die Rekonstruktion des Bebens von 1590 in
Niederösterreich, Springer Verlag, Vienna, Austria, 221 pp., 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hammerl, C.: Die Geschichte der Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und
Geodynamik, in: Hammerl et al., 2001, 17–297, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hammerl, C. and Lenhardt, W.: Erdbeben in Österreich, Leykam Verlag,
Graz, 191 pp., 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hammerl, C. and Lenhardt, W.: Erdbeben in Niederösterreich von 1000 bis
2009 n. Chr. Abh. Geol. B.-A., Vienna, Vol. 67,  297 pp., 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hammerl, C., Lenhardt, W., Steinacker, R., and Steinhauser, P. (Eds.):
Meteorologie und Geophysik in Österreich, A comprehensive compilation of
the institutional history on the occasion of the 150-year jubilee of the
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Wien, Leykam Verlag, 838
pp., 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hoernes, R.: Erdbebenstudien. Jahrbuch der k.k. geologischen <span style="" class="text">Reichsanstalt</span>, Vol. 28/3, 387–448, Vienna, 1878.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Holcomb, G. and Hutt, R.: Three Installations methods for the STS-1 were
tested at the Albuquerque Seismological Lab (ALS), USGS Open File Report
USA, 92–302, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Jeffreys, H.: On two british earthquakes, Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society, Geophysical Supplement, 1, 483–494, 1927.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kreil, K.: Über einen neuen Erdbebenmesser. Sitzungsberichte der
math.-naturw, Classe der kais, Akademie der Wissenschaften, XV. Bd., p.
370, Vienna, 1855.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kreil, K.: Magnetische und geographische Ortsbestimmungen im
südöstlichen Europa und einigen Küstenpunkten Asiens,
Sitzungsberichte der math.-naturw. Classe am 24. Juni 1859, Denkschriften, Bd. XX, 1862.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Lenhardt, W.: Regional earthquake hazard in Austria, Proc. of “10th European
Conference on Earthquake Engineering”, edited by: Duma, G., Balkema, 63–68, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lenhardt, W., Melichar, P., Steiner, R., and Horn, N.: Erdbebenstationen in
Österreich, in: Hammerl et al., 2001, 567–576, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Meurers, B., Blaumoser, N., Göschke, M., Haden S., Melichar, P., and
Steiner R.: Das Supraleitende Gravimeter in Wien – ein Beitrag zur modernen
geodynamischen Forschung, in: Hammerl et al., 2001, 608–618, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, S. V., Hutt, C. R., Anthony, R. E., Ringler, A. T., Alejandro, A. C. B., and
Wilson, D. C.: A Collection of Historic Seismic Instrumentation Photographs
at the Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory, Seismol. Res. Lett.,
90,   765–773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180267</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Neubauer, W.: Geophysikalisch-archäologische Prospektion an der ZAMG, in:
Hammerl et al.,  2001, 726–743, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Neubauer, W. and Seren, S.: Die Entdeckung der Gladiatorenschule in
Carnuntum, Acta Carnuntina, 2, 4–13, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Neubauer, W., Doneus, M., Trinks, I., Verhoven, G., Hinterleitner, A.,
Seren, S., and Löcker, K.: Long-term integrated archaeological
prospection at the Roman town of Carnuntum/Austria – Archaeological Survey
and the City. Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK, 202–221, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Oldroyd, D., Amador, F., Kozak, J., Carneiro, A., and Pinto, M.: The study of
earthquakes in the hundred years following the Lisbon earthquake of 1755,
Earth Sciences History,  History of the Earth Sciences
Society, 26, 321–370, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
ÖNORM: Belastungsannahmen im Bauwesen, Erdbebenkräfte an nicht
schwingungsanfälligen Bauwerken – ÖNORM B 4015, Austrian Standards
Institute (ON), DK 624.042.7:550.34  (436), 10 pp., 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
ÖNORM: Belastungsannahmen im Bauwesen, Außergewöhnliche
Einwirkungen, Erdbebeneinwirkungen, Grundlagen – ÖNORM B 4015-1,
Austrian Standards Institute (ON), ICS 91.010.30, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Pesaresi, D., Picozzi, M., Živčić, M., Lenhardt, W.,
Mucciarelli, M., Elia, L., Zollo, A., and Gosar, A.: A cross-border regional
earthquake early warning system: PRESTo@CE3RN, Nat. Hazards, 86, 431–440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2695-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2695-0</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Picozzi, M., Elia, L., Pesaresi, D., Zollo, A., Mucciarelli, M., Gosar, A.,
Lenhardt, W., and Zivcic, M.: Trans-National Earthquake Early Warning (EEW)
in North-Eastern Italy, Slovenia and Austria: First Experience with PRESTo
at the CE<sup>3</sup>RN Network, EGU2014 SM1.2/GI3.7 session, 19
pp., 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Sakal, F., Müller, D., Hinterleitner, A., Löcker, K., and Seren, S.:
Jebel el-Hamam, Final report about the Syrian-German Survey, Zeitschrift
für Orient-Archäologie, Band 7, ISBN
978-3-8030-0221-1, 158–196, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Seren, S., Blaumoser, N., and Melichar, P.: Erfassung von Altlasten, in:
Hammerl et al., 2001, 717–725, 2001a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Seren, S., Eder-Hinterleitner, A., and Melichar, P.: 3D-Erkundung mittels
Georadar und Seismik im Felshohlraumbau, in:   Hammerl et al., 2001, 707–716,
2001b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Seren, S., Löcker, K., Hinterleitner, A., and Ladstätter, S.: Ephesos
revisited: A decade of geophysical prospection on different field conditions
in Ephesos, Turkey, 9. International Conference on Archaeological
Prospection in Izmir/Türkei, Proceedings, 90–92, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Sevara, C., Salisbury, R., Totschnig, R., Doneus, M., Löcker, K., and
Tusa, S.: New discoveries at Mokarta, a Bronze Age hilltop settlement in
western Sicily, Antiquity, 94, 686–704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.171</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Suess, E.: Die Erdbeben Nieder-Österreichs, Denkschrift Kgl. Akad.
Wissenschaft, Wien, Mat. Naturw., Klasse 33, 61–98, 1873.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Toperczer, M.: Das geophysikalische Observatorium Wien-Kobenzl. Arch. f.
Met., Geoph. und Bioklimatologie, Serie: Meteorologie und Geophysik, Band
9, 3. Heft, 1956.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Toperczer, M.: Die Geschichte der Geophysik an der Zentralanstalt für
Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Arb. aus der Zentralanst. f. Met. und Geodyn.,
Publ. Nr. 208, 24 pp., 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Toperczer, M. and Trapp, E.: Ein Beitrag zur Erdbebengeographie
Österreichs nebst Erdbebenkatalog 1904–1948 und Chronik der Starkbeben.
Mitteilungen der Erdbeben-Kommission, Neue Folge Nr. 65, Österr. Akad.
d. Wissenschaften, Vienna, Austria, 59 pp., 1950.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
TSN: Total Slovenia News,  available at: <a href="https://www.total-slovenia-news.com/lifestyle/1046-old-photos-ljubljana-after-the-earthquake" target="_blank"/>, last access: 17 February 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Vicentini, G. and Pacher, G.: Considerazioni sugli apparecchi sismici
registratori e modificazione del microsismografo a due componenti, Boll.
Soc. sism. ital. II, 107–121, 1896.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Vicentini, G. and Pacher, G.: Microsismografo per la componente verticale,
Atti Ist. veneto Sci. Ser., 7, 65–89, 1898.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Wiechert, E.: Ein astatisches Pendel hoher Empfindlichkeit zur mechanischen
Registrierung von Erdbeben, Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik, Bd. VI,
435–450, 1904.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
ZAMG: “Jahrbuch 1856”, Annual report of ZAMG, Library of the ZAMG, Vienna, 1856.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
ZAMG: Photo by Lammerhuber on behalf of ZAMG, Archive of ZAMG,  2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
ZAMG: Stonehenge,
<a href="https://www.zamg.ac.at/cms/de/geophysik/news/neue-entdeckung-bei-stonehenge-mit-oesterreichischer-beteiligung" target="_blank"/>,
last access: 1 December 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
